That is may summation. All that is left is the suffering of persecution by the few righteous who are left.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I can only be killed once.
Despair is a sin.
/johnny
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
This is exactly how it will happen. It will be such a gradual process that most wont notice, until it is too late.
3 posted on
01/15/2013 6:40:28 PM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Bearing arms is not a privilege.
4 posted on
01/15/2013 6:42:06 PM PST by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Guns? What guns?
I lost all my weapons in a tragic boating accident on Crater Lake. ;^(
14 posted on
01/15/2013 6:56:08 PM PST by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Infringe: (transitive and intransitive verb) encroach on somebody's rights or property: to take over land, rights, privileges, or activities that belong to somebody else, especially in a minor or gradual way If that %$#@ John Roberts doesn't have a Websters Dictionary I can send him one.
20 posted on
01/15/2013 7:03:08 PM PST by
skeeter
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
22 posted on
01/15/2013 7:05:29 PM PST by
donaldo
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Well at least we didn't elect no dang Mormon.
23 posted on
01/15/2013 7:05:41 PM PST by
oldbrowser
(They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Civil disobedience is order, and civil is the operative word. Do not register any weapon. It will make it more difficult for them to confiscate. If they do attempt to confiscate, civil is no longer the operative word.
Now this is really important, so take some time and think about. At the time of confiscation, the operative word becomes "offensive". For positive imagery purposes, think of the British retreat from Lexington and Concord back to Boston. That is what Americans do to tyrants that try to confiscate our weapons.
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I’m not paying jack sh!t. And I’m keeping every damn one of them.
F U B O!! and your ilk.
27 posted on
01/15/2013 7:12:37 PM PST by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I will keep them and I will NOT pay, I will not give them up, I may sell them at some point in time. That is all I will do. They can Kiss my R.R.A and
Molon Labe (if they can)
28 posted on
01/15/2013 7:13:37 PM PST by
EXCH54FE
(Hurricane 416)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Eventually many people like the “Bear Jew” will emerge with only a Bat!
34 posted on
01/15/2013 7:22:17 PM PST by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Registration, licensing, short-term licensing requiring frequent renewal with ever-increasing licensing cost ...
It’s unconstitutional to license a right.
37 posted on
01/15/2013 7:35:37 PM PST by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
They probably wont get around to it, because they will have crashed the economy before long,
and will be sorta busy dealing with social chaos as people go 'Mad Max' fighting for necessities.
42 posted on
01/15/2013 7:55:38 PM PST by
45semi
(A police state is always preceded by a nanny state...)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Someone will bring this up sooner or later, but assuming you are right (that the government will "make us pay dearly" for our 2nd amendment rights), how can they justify it?
The Bill of Rights should apply equally to the poor as well as the rich. Unjust and excessive taxation of gun ownership is discrimination against the poor.
The SCOTUS says that a woman's right to privacy (i.e. abortion) is so important that the taxpayers must provide it for free to those unable to afford it.
They said that a person's right to vote was absolute, such that any attempt to charge a fee (poll tax) was unconstitutional.
Is Sandra Fluke's right to birth control more important than a single mother's right to protect her family?
51 posted on
01/15/2013 8:43:35 PM PST by
ZOOKER
( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
We must get the backing of states, or break away areas within states, to openly defy the federal government on blatantly unconstitutional laws and mandates, thereby bringing us into conflict. The feds must be put in a position to accept us retaking our liberty, or using armed force against the state to impose tyranny. The American public will not support the price that it would take on both sides for this aggression, and neither will many who would potentially be the ones to enforce tyranny.
Even a smaller group of armed patriots gathered openly would cause hesitation because of the unpopular toll that it would take defeating them. Liberals for the most part wouldn't accept any action any more than Conservatives, and Obama doesn't control a giant robotic force that can't refuse orders.
One of the rumored executive orders Obama will issue will withhold state funds if not obeyed. That's the kind of issues that should be openly defied, and once they try withholding funds then federal tax collection should be stopped. Our best option is getting them to come to us anyway we can before having to go to them. I think it can be much more successful than an armed march on Washington, or having to make the first move to fight. Each side would rather the other escalate any violence, before reacting with violence. Having a specific enemy, and a preferred outlet to act is wanted, but is something you should assume won't be the case.
Open defiance at the local level of these issues and others like Obamacare also have the most potential for a peaceful outcome. I don't think the feds would fill comfortable escalating the situation. The stronger the patriot force and resolve, the less likely they would underestimate the toll that aggression would cost. I believe we can have a peaceful revolt this way, but we all have to do what we can to get things moving in time if it's going to be possible.
www.OathKeepers.org
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Persecute back, works for me.
55 posted on
01/15/2013 9:38:40 PM PST by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
"Shall Not Be Infringed"
56 posted on
01/15/2013 9:46:46 PM PST by
Mat_Helm
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
i guess whoever kills first, then...
57 posted on
01/15/2013 10:46:45 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I predict a second American civil war WILL take place, MARK MY WORDS.
59 posted on
01/16/2013 3:37:53 AM PST by
Biggirl
("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson