Onaka verified some stuff, but not other stuff. The stuff he didn’t verify is not as important as the stuff he did. Your theory seems to be that anything less than 100% is 0%, is that correct?
The only lawful reason for Onaka to refuse to verify ANY of the items requested is if he lawfully can’t, because he can’t certify that that’s how the event really happened. He would not verify ANY item from the actual request form = a form which cannot be interpreted as anything but a request for verification of the TRUTH of the facts submitted for verification.
That tells us everything we need to know. He would not verify anything as being the way the event actually happened. That’s not my theory. That’s what the law says. He SHALL PROVIDE verification of the existence of the record AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR VERIFICATION.
Everything else could be interpreted as a request for verification that those claims are merely on the birth record at the HDOH. Which legally means nothing, since the record they have is legally worthless.
What evidence do you have that Onaka violated HRS 338-14.3? Because that’s what you’re accusing him of - getting this verification wrong. What is your evidence against him?