Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Actual title, snipped because it's too long:

Obama lied: Analysis of social media in Libya on day of Benghazi jihad massacre finds no reference to Muhammad video that Obama blamed for attack


1 posted on 12/19/2012 9:37:50 AM PST by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Perseverando
King Obama is a radical Muslim and they lie.
2 posted on 12/19/2012 9:41:31 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando; annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; ...
Taqqiya has become the new normal. The liar in chief and the artful dodger in the state department have taken it to a whole new plane of existence...theirs. The arabeasts are inside the walls.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

3 posted on 12/19/2012 10:11:52 AM PST by MestaMachine (It's the !!!!TREASON!!!!, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando
In the case of Fort Hood, Obama made the US military less safe, but not allowing current Islamic Jihadist within the US military to be investigated.

In the case of Benghazi, Obama made the world less safe for Americans citizens staying within countries that have significant Islamic populations. He did this by falsely accusing an anti-Muslim video, which gave the video more publicity further enraging Muslims.

In the case of Sandy Hook, Obama will attempt to make America less safe for American citizens by taking away their only defense from domestic attacks.

See the commonality in these three cases ?

4 posted on 12/19/2012 11:00:22 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando

There was no demonstration. Just an organized attack on the “consulate”.


6 posted on 12/19/2012 11:51:06 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando
I have asked myself many times, 'Why did the defense dept. not send in any contingent to rescue the 30 + 4 (died).' They claimed they did not have enough time. But as these events unfolded how could Panetta, Clinton, or Obama have know that? They could only know post facto. It might have been that they could have held out 8 days, instead of 8 hours. So now, what are we to make of these decisions? It seems, from the behavior exemplified since then, that the decision not to rescue has only one plausible rational conclusion. That is this. Obama, Clinton, and Panetta, looking toward the upcoming election, wanted all 34 people to die. But when these men of valor, against orders, did not abandon these people, but extracted them to the 'safe-house' where it became impossible to maintain the illusion of video induced attack. For Political reasons this bunch of leaders wanted these 34 dead. They wanted noone to be questioned. They wanted a blank page to write their putrid fiction to cover their posterior. Nothing else makes sense. They wanted them dead.

Now, the State Dept. will not allow the names of these people to be made public. Hannity and Chenowith tonight, despite being told not to talk, said (both men) said they had spoken to one man who was in the attack and they told the Congressman and Hannity that the American people had been lied to since the first report.

This Administration wanted ALL of them dead. Dead people do not talk. That only leaves speculation and the lies of the Administration to mold a historical report.

8 posted on 12/19/2012 7:18:03 PM PST by Texas Songwriter ( i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson