Skip to comments.Another Court Loss: Preliminary Injunction Denied(CA, San Francisco)
Posted on 11/29/2012 1:07:10 AM PST by marktwain
Yesterday an NRA backed case that challenged San Franciscos safe storage and ammunition restrictions lost in District Court. Reading the opinion here, I find myself stunned by this:
Plaintiffs showing as to the severity of the burdens imposed by section 4512, The Safe Storage Law, is only marginally better. As noted above, section 4512 gives San Francisco residents the very set of rights the Heller plaintiff sought and obtained. San Franciscans may lawfully possess handguns in their own homes, may carry them in their own homes at any time, and may use them for self-defense without running afoul of any aspect of the ordinance. Plaintiffs have offered only the possibility that in a very narrow range of circumstances, the delay inherent in rendering a handgun operable or in retrieving it from a locked container theoretically could impair a persons ability to employ it successfully in self-defense. Even assuming this rises to the level of a substantial burden, however, thereby triggering some heightened degree of scrutiny, plaintiffs have not shown the regulation to be overreaching or improper in any way, or that it fails to serve a legitimate governmental interest. Indeed, as noted in Heller itself, nothing in its analysis suggest[s] the invalidity of laws regulating the storage of firearms to prevent accidents.
This is disingenuous, and the quote taken from the full context. The full quote from the Heller opinion, in full context, is this:
The other laws Justice BREYER cites are gunpowder-storage laws that he concedes did not clearly prohibit loaded weapons, but required only that excess gunpowder be kept in a special container or on the top floor of the home. Post, at 2849-2850. Nothing about those fire-safety laws undermines our analysis; they do not remotely burden the right of self-defense as much as an absolute ban on handguns. Nor, correspondingly, does our analysis suggest the invalidity of laws regulating the storage of firearms to prevent accidents.
The majority is refuting justice Stevens dissenting argument about 18th century laws that mandated storage of excess gunpowder on the top floor of the home, and speaking of safe storage in a context which does not burden the right of self-defense to any real degree. Any honest reading of Heller has to come to terms with the fact that the invalidity of storage requirements that interfere with self-defense is unambiguously part of Hellers holding:
We must also address the Districts requirement (as applied to respondents handgun) that firearms in the home be rendered and kept inoperable at all times. This makes it impossible for citizens to use them for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional.
It is difficult to see how the San Francisco ordinance is materially different from that of the District of Columbias. I can accept that on the matter of ammunition restrictions, a judge has some room to suggest that case law is not that well established, and perhaps a preliminary injunction is not appropriate, but regardless of what is stated in Nordyke, which cannot control Heller, any requirement that a firearm be bound by a lock or stored in a way that makes it unavailable for self-defense is pretty unambiguously unconstitutional. The judge here pulls dicta out of context, in an attempt to ignore the core holding in Heller. It is worth noting that the judge in this case is an Obama appointee. Elections have consequences.
NRA Heller ping
The trend in home invasions (which are on the rise in the obama economy btw) is to intentionally do them during the day when you are home and not asleep. They want instant hostages, they want you not to be in bed - most people with firearms keep them bedside. The average home invasion is done by a crew of three. Ready to handle three thugs breaking down your door? Keep a firearm within arms reach at all times. Locked away is useless, except for the lowlifes who will threaten you and yours to gain access to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.