Posted on 08/08/2012 6:51:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
How much of an effect do high gasoline prices have upon the rate of layoffs in the U.S. economy?
Today, following the initial confirmation of our hypothesis that they do have a significant effect as measured by the number of new jobless claims filed every week, we're going to attempt to quantify how big an impact that high gasoline prices has upon the employee retention decisions of U.S. employers.
We define "high gasoline prices" as being when the national average price of a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline in the United States rises above $3.50 per gallon, in terms of 2011-12 U.S. dollars. This price level appears to be significant in affecting both the spending of U.S. consumers, who respond by cutting back their spending on other goods and services, and the cost of doing business for U.S. employers, who face higher fuel and transportation costs, both directly and indirectly through their supply chains.
Previously, we've observed that whenever the national average price of gasoline crosses this level, the number of seasonally-adjusted initial unemployment insurance claims that are filed each week is affected some two to three weeks later. If it rises above the $3.50 per gallon mark, we observe an upward shift in the number of new jobless claims being filed and if it falls below it, we observe a downward shift in the number of new jobless claims being filed each week.
An upward shift corresponds to the situation where business revenues are falling while costs are rising, triggering the decision to lay off employees, while a downward shift corresponds to the opposite situation, resulting in employees being retained.
The two-to-three week long time lag between when the price of gasoline crosses this critical level to when it shows up in the BLS' new jobless claims data may be attributed to the typical payroll cycle of U.S. businesses, where they react to the change in their business outlook with their next payroll cycle - allowing the current payroll cycle to play out. Since the vast majority of Americans are paid weekly, biweekly or semi-monthly, the time-delayed reaction of employers to an event affecting their employee retention decisions to when in shows up in the government's official data is about 2 to 3 weeks.
We have previously attributed the last four shifts in the major trends for new jobless claims in the U.S. to the national average gasoline price crossing the apparently critical threshold of $3.50 per gallon. And because it just rose above that level on the week ending 30 July 2012 after having fallen below it just several weeks before that, we anticipate we'll see a significant upward shift with either this week's jobless claim data or with next week's data.
That's the "coming surge" we described in the title of this post. But how big will that surge be?
Looking over the past four shifts in the major trends for new jobless claims, we would anticipate that having average gasoline prices in the U.S. rise above $3.50 per gallon will add anywhere from an additional 15,000 to 25,000 to the number of people filing for first-time unemployment insurance benefits each week while gasoline prices remain high.
That brings us to our next problem: volatility in the data.
Previously, we had the benefit of gasoline prices remaining steadily either above or below the $3.50 per gallon mark for extended periods of time, which makes it relatively easy to measure the size of the shift in new jobless claims.
But with gasoline prices hovering so close to the apparently critical threshold of $3.50 per gallon right now, we can expect to see quite a bit of volatility in the weekly data for new jobless claims, as the shifts we describe are combined with natural statistical variation about the underlying trend for new jobless claims, which has been rising since mid-February. And especially if the average price of gas in the U.S. keeps crossing the threshold!
As a result, we could very well see some pretty dramatic swings from week to week until gasoline prices stabilize either above $3.50 per gallon or below it.
Too confusing for me.
I think it just means that the more $ going into the tank leaves less $ for anything else = less demand = fewer workers needed.
We need to stop the insanity of central planning in energy as a first priority to allow markets to provide a broader range of transportation fuels and consumer choice choice based on price sensitivity. At the very least, we need to break down regulatory barriers to affordable conversion of existing gasoline powered vehicles to CNG hybrids... or anything else that would allow us to escape the very real economic damage from being locked into gasoline by the regulatory structure.
The Ministry of Truth said yesterday that we have the smallest government in 45 years, too.
(Are people so desperate to ‘Believe’?)
Errr.... My work hours have been cut from 42 hours a week to 30 a week effective today. I haven’t told the wife yet...
Errr.... My work hours have been cut from 42 hours a week to 30 a week effective today. I haven’t told the wife yet...
Errr.... My work hours have been cut from 42 hours a week to 30 a week effective today. I haven’t told the wife yet...
While I am not excited about high gas prices, I look at them as an investment to ensure Obama does not get re-elected.
Even with the increase, hiring is competitive.
Hiring isn't competitive, when you have more people chasing jobs than are available. Getting hired is competitive.
It's just little stuff like this that irritates me.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.