Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Who can provide some definition about the difference between protection of privacy and obstruction of justice?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UH4BHau2EV8

1 posted on 07/29/2012 4:30:19 PM PDT by TexasVoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TexasVoter

The details about the interview with Nagamine appears in the 3rd video down on the page.


2 posted on 07/29/2012 4:34:15 PM PDT by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

I am pretty sure we have just been told. They did what ever they wanted with it...

That means editing it to fit their needs.

We know they did this.

Their refusal to turn over anything is a good indication that they have nothing to turn over.


3 posted on 07/29/2012 4:37:14 PM PDT by cableguymn (For the first time in my life. I fear my country's government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter
It's neither. It's a Constitutional crisis.

Arizona has Article IV Section 1 power of full faith and credit access to the public records of Hawaii. If Hawaii refuses to comply, they are violating the Constitution.

Congress can step in and exercise its Article IV power to regulate the manner in which states share their public records, but Congress has not intervened.

-PJ

4 posted on 07/29/2012 4:40:07 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It doesn't come naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter
It seems to me that the definition of "obstruction of justice" closely resembles what Joe Apraio's investgators experienced in Hawaii...

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/obstruction+of+justice

Excerpt:

Federal obstruction of justice statutes have been used to prosecute government officials who have sought to prevent the disclosure of damaging information.
The problem is, of course, that Eric Holder would be responsible for prosecution, yes?
5 posted on 07/29/2012 4:44:44 PM PDT by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

I think it comes down to the definition of misprision of forgery and misprision of fraud. There is a legal responsibility to report what you know to be a forgery and fraud. It could be argued that since the long-form and COLB were not presented as evidence to anybody, that them being out there does not constitute fraud, but I think when something is presented in a press conference from the White House it constitutes a whole different level of integrity in question and there could be legal ramifications.

Bush never testified in court about WMD’s yet how much time and money was spent in trying to figure out whether he defrauded America by saying something untrue in a speech he gave to the country? Whatever was the legal basis for investigating that would also serve as the legal basis for investigating the forgeries as actual forgery and fraud and not just as presenting a hoax as a “joke” without legal ramifications.

If presenting a forgery and defrauding the American people from the White House is a crime, then the workers at the HDOH had a legal responsibility to report that crime.

Furthermore, a big issue right now is whether the HDOH people themselves have committed crimes including fraud and forgery. The HDOH employees themselves are reasonable suspects. Nothing in the law allows them to be protected from investigation of THEMSELVES, which is what is really going on here. And the whole purpose of UIPA, FOIA, etc is so that people can hold GOVERNMENT accountable. What did the HDOH know about the crimes of fraud and forgery, when did they know it, what was their legal responsibility, and what crimes, if any, have they committed? Those are PROPER issues that supersede individuals’ “privacy rights” according to UIPA.

As for HIPAA, I have read the release statement that I’m required to sign in order to get medical services at my local clinic. It specifies that the records can be released to law enforcement engaged in a criminal investigation and that my records have no privacy guarantees if needed to protect the safety of the President. Well... the acting President right now should Constitutionally be either Joe Biden or John Boehner, and if medical records are needed to protect them, then Kapiolani Hospital has a duty to release the medical records necessary to that purpose.

I am not a lawyer, but there are serious issues regarding the responsibilities of EVERYBODY who knew about this fraud, and I hope that some lawyers will weigh in on this.


8 posted on 07/29/2012 4:51:44 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

Former Prosector of 25 years says:

1. Obstruction of justice is interfering, through word or deed, with the a lawful and valid criminal investigation of a court or officer of the court.

2. Protection of privacy is the legal requirement of the State or corporation to protect the private information of individuals.

Violation of either are/can be crimes depending upon the jurisdiction.


11 posted on 07/29/2012 5:37:00 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

Just thought I would add this in. It is an anti-Obama song; “When Your Holding a Hammer, Everything Looks Like a Nail”. It can be downloaded or ordered on cd.

http://holdingahammer.com/


13 posted on 07/29/2012 6:14:48 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter
"...lawfully sworn investigators from Arizona..."

Have no power to do anything outside their jurisdiction.

The Kenyan must go.

14 posted on 07/29/2012 6:34:14 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

I do not believe in any of the birther stuff. He wasn’t born in Kenya, his parents did not need to be citizens, his father was not Malcolm X or Marshall Davis or Fat Albert. He is a natural born, all American commie, the kind our schools, universities, and movie theaters churn out by the tens of thousands.

That said, I can understand why he cannot wash himself clean of this. The simple fact is that a large proportion of Americans cannot relate to him. He does not share any of the basic American values that even liberal Presidents of the past shared. He doesn’t understand our culture, our Constitution, or our religion. He does not understand why we think we are exceptional or why we are so gosh darn set on capitalism and gun ownership. He is American by birth, but not by culture or worldview, and that is why people just instinctively feel he is not natural born, even if the facts indicate that he is.


19 posted on 07/29/2012 9:00:49 PM PDT by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]





"The President...
has dedicated a lot of energy and focus..."



24 posted on 07/30/2012 9:50:10 AM PDT by devolve (-------------- ------- OHMSS ----------- ---------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson