Replies

I bet you can even explain how ‘birth records’ that two eyewitnesses described as “handwritten” transformed into a standard print-form. No doubt you also believe that when Abercrombie told his friend no BC existed in HI for Barack Hussein Obama, his friend merely misunderstood him. After all, it's so easy to hear ‘no BC exists for Obama’ and think you heard, ‘I don't know what all the hoopla is about; the BC is right there in the file, right where it's supposed to be’. And surely the friend would have asked no follow up questions to such earth-shaking news. He would merely have said, ‘Well that's interesting; how 'bout them Warriors?’

In case it wasn't clear what ‘earth-shaking news’ I was talking about, here's a clarification. Abercrombie's friend repeated the big news all over the place, on air, the following day. I.e.: the big news that no BC existed on file in HI for Barack Obama. If you say his friend was mistaken, then how do you explain how excited and sure of himself he sounded? If you had a friend who was in a position to know, and he told you no BC existed in HI for Obama, don't you think you'd follow up? If all you said was, ‘Are you sure—as in positive—it's not there?’, surely you'd say that much. The anti-birther narrative re: how confused the friend was is just silly. Only a full on moonbat Obot would believe it.