Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick
I think a reasonable person would agree that the article blam posted the other day crosses some kind of line into unhealthy preoccupation with the presumed horrors that are in store for non-preppers.

But how many reasonable people DISagreed with your ill-defined "line" on the very thread you refer to?

The historical fact, and modern possibility, of racism does not excuse the existence of an Al Sharpton.

THIS reasonable person sees more contrived defense of your own belligerence, than any quantifiable desire on the part of those you malign.

And I think you underestimate how difficult it is for people to keep the two propositions that you mention separated. When they intermingle, you get something like blam’s article.

Actually, your reaction to the article would seem the more appropriate example of that particular error.

94 posted on 05/15/2012 1:43:20 PM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

Well yeah, lots of people disagreed, but how do you know they were reasonable? If you waded into a rapture thread and accused them of secretly hoping for the apocalypse, I’m sure you’d have a whole bunch of “reasonable” people riled up at you. You’d be right and they’d be wrong, but they’d be indignant nevertheless.


96 posted on 05/15/2012 2:16:48 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson