You miss a huge factor: Obama’s supporters versus Romney’s supporters. We don’t have Kings who rule by edict. Obamas pro gay stances are far more dangerous than Mitts - simply because the majority of Obama’s supporters will gleefully push that agenda.
This is not to excuse Romney - that’s not the point. The point is how malignantly dangerous to our society the two sides are. One if far more malignant than the other, even if they are both equally un pure. Which they are.
You are correct.....Mitt would never have the guts to put a flaming sodomite in charge of the educational system of our children like zero. Brainwashing, conditioning and sexualizing young children is blatantly happening with ignorant parents thinking it is “progressive”.
Marxists always go after the children—to change their worldview (with lies and sex education to destroy Christian morality and insert pagan/atheism).
The parents with the “old fashioned ideas of Judeo/Christian Ethics” will die off in a decade or so anyways.
Marxists have subverted public education since Dewey and got total control under Carter. Schools and media are forming the foundation of “Right and Wrong” in our children based on the Satanic religion and Alinsky. OWS are examples of what public school vomits out.....they are devoid of reason and Christian morality-—just useful idiots to be controlled and directed by Marxists.
Hi, CEW.
In a congress of democrats, rinos, and conservatives, a pro-gay Romney will be able to push the gay agenda if he decides to. The dems + the rinos + the president will equal a majority.
Except for his secret ambitions, Mitt Romney would be a democrat. We all know it.
Obama’s supporters (Obamabots) and Romney’s supporters (Mittbots) are both non-conservative. The real conservatives are fighting both guys tool and nail each step of the way.