Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demand a Romney/Gingrich Debate!
FreeRepublic.com ^ | 4/12/12 | myself

Posted on 04/12/2012 8:38:01 AM PDT by Mr. K

Now that the choices are narrowed we should have a Gingrich-Romney debate

They would have more time than ever before to say their side, and Gingrich would get a lot of time to speak


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: cowardromney; gingrich; ineligibleromney; loserromney; patriotgingrich; poserromney; rinoromney; speakergingrich; yellowromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
He would DESTROY Obomney and Paul and show that a Gingrich/Obama debate would be a bloodbath (for Obama)
1 posted on 04/12/2012 8:38:11 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

go to every site you can and express support

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=frgbld&gs_nf=1&cp=18&gs_id=1i&xhr=t&q=newt+gingrich+for+president&pf=p&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&oq=newt+gingrich+for+&aq=0&aqi=g4&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=799dc676f220bf41&biw=1071&bih=528


2 posted on 04/12/2012 8:39:51 AM PDT by Mr. K (If Romney wins the primary, I am writing-in PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Romney is not that stupid.

I wish he was.


3 posted on 04/12/2012 8:41:51 AM PDT by cableguymn (Good thing I am a conservative. Otherwise I would have to support Mittens like Republicans do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Myth has nothing to win and everything to lose by agreeing to such a debate, so it ain’t gonna happen.


4 posted on 04/12/2012 8:43:10 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Romney will never agree to it. He has no reason to. Newt’s campaign is broke, so why would he want to breathe new life into it?


5 posted on 04/12/2012 8:43:41 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Romney has nothing to gain, which is why he was already skipping debates.


6 posted on 04/12/2012 8:44:24 AM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

This appears to be wrapped up, I can’t see Romney wanting to do this unless that becomes a good attention getting forum to attack Obama instead of each other IMO.


7 posted on 04/12/2012 8:48:42 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

LOL, why would Romney agree to a debate?

Much as I’d like to see it, there is exactly 0% chance of this happening.


8 posted on 04/12/2012 8:54:00 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Myth has nothing to win and everything to lose by agreeing to such a debate,

Romney has too much liberalism to hide. He's done risking exposure.

I find Romney repulsive. In clean conscience, I simply can't see myself voting for him. I think I'd throw up - for real.

9 posted on 04/12/2012 8:56:02 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Which is worse? Romney I or Obama II?

It's (probably) down to that, unfortunately.

10 posted on 04/12/2012 9:00:56 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Since Mitt isn't likely to agree to any formal debate, Newt could always follow him around and "debate" Romney in absentia, as he said he'd do with Obama.

Nothing to lose, right?

11 posted on 04/12/2012 9:02:28 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

as much as i loathe to say this throw up andvote for romney because newt can’t win and it’s now romney or the dictatorship of zero. if you think zero shredded the Constitution in his first term think what he WILL do in a second term


12 posted on 04/12/2012 9:03:34 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Without the rest of the states like Iowa, Florida, New Hamphire etc. giving a darn about the other states that would also like to have a say in this process, Romney will probably get away with hiding himself and his views the rest of the way.

The other state parties won’t demand fairness for their sister-state parties.

The system is rigged and we all know it.


13 posted on 04/12/2012 9:07:11 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Yes, that is exactly what he will do.

In fact, I understand a big televised debate is scheduled down in Texas just before the Texas and California primaries, and two of the three remaining republican candidates have already accepted.


14 posted on 04/12/2012 9:12:29 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

“Newt’s campaign is broke, so why would he want to breathe new life into it?”

To push the campaign in to summer, keeping the sheeple informed and interested, while keeping Obama’s bad news in the daily news cycles.

Debates are a CHEAP way to get millions of viewers, and control the news cycles.

Remember 2008?

It might actually work to Romney’s ADVANTAGE, and it’s not like NEwt has a chance at winning, anyhow, even though I support him.


15 posted on 04/12/2012 9:17:30 AM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Newt could always follow him around and "debate" Romney in absentia, as he said he'd do with Obama.

I doubt Newt could afford to do that at this point.

16 posted on 04/12/2012 9:22:17 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]




Click the Pic

That reminds me!
Free Republic could use a fill-up too


Donate monthly to help abolish FReepathons
Sponsors will donate $10 for each new monthly sign-up

17 posted on 04/12/2012 9:22:59 AM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ngat
The system is rigged, but the system still depends upon us going along with their rigging.

Newt has 9 lives. I am not counting him out until Mitt has certified more than the majority of deligates and even then shite can happen.

You can count on Texas going to Newt. With Rick dropped out, the deligate's he won may now be open to drifting over to Newt. When its a clear black and white comparison between Mitt and one Conservative, can't see many Conservatives wanting Mitt.

If Rick didn't have the grit to stay in he should have jumped out long ago unless he was shilling for Mitt.

18 posted on 04/12/2012 9:27:00 AM PDT by X-spurt (Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey
if you think zero shredded the Constitution in his first term think what he WILL do in a second term

Take the house and senate. DO vote for these!

Personally - and to each their own - I'm tired of the RINOs tilting the tables for their choice. I'm making my own choice this time.

19 posted on 04/12/2012 9:28:02 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Which is worse? Romney I or Obama II?”

Obama II will push the country over the edge, and you’ll probably see the same crowds, hopping mad, in at least 1 out of 5 major cities that we saw in DC to protest PPACA.

Romney I will lull a Lot of the sleepers who call themselves Centrists or Moderates back to sleep.

We’ll get stuck with Obama Policies Either way, it’s just that if Romney wins, we’ll sit back and listen to all that crap about HOPE again.

We HOPE Romney becomes a conservative.
We HOPE he saves us from allowing ourselves to get snookered again.


20 posted on 04/12/2012 9:33:22 AM PDT by To-Whose-Benefit? (It is Error alone which needs the support of Government. The Truth can stand by itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson