Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
http://www.onenewspage.com/n/Politics/74r3td1hd/Santorum-Was-Basically-Pro-Choice-All.htm

http://www.onenewspage.com/n/Business/74r3td3lr/Santorum-In-1995-Was-Basically-Pro.

Here are two sources among several.....Is it a liberal source? Yes it is. Did you expect the Santorum campaign to go out of their way to look into Santorum’s past? NO!

Does the source make it a lie? Not really! Because they are open to slander among several issues. But the truth is where you find it, once you take the time to look. And in comparison, lots and lots of anti Gingrich articles have been posted here from similar sources.

135 posted on 03/18/2012 7:56:07 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Does the source make it a lie? Not really! Because they are open to slander among several issues.

Oh, spare me. The MSM lies about conservatives with impunity, and you know better.

Make the case why Newt is better than Santorum. I belive that myself.

However, the 2005 attacks against Santorum were part of an orchestrated Dem attack on him to peel away his support by pro-life Dems, since that was vital to Santorum's forumla for winning statewide in PA. I know, I live here. I know the trash sources being cited. You should read City Paper some time - they basically paint Republicans as demons and are pro-gay, pro-abort, anti-gun and pro-welfare. Is that the kind of source you want to be citing?

138 posted on 03/18/2012 8:00:55 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson