Posted on 03/08/2012 3:21:30 PM PST by opentalk
I’m posting the 1991 Obama Hannity exclusive in this post because I feel like Malkin’s fierce defense of vetting Obama and not just shrugging our shoulders goes hand in hand with this exclusive. First, the main Hannity segment via Mediaite:
They do a great job of explaining why this is important, especially the fact that Ogletree hid the video in 2008. As Hannity says it is one more brick in the foundation of exposing Obama’s radical connections.
Below, Michelle Malkin and Juan Williams go on Hannity to discuss the video. Juan plays it down saying he thought there’d be more and in the middle of the segment plays the “guilt by association” card excusing it.
But Malkin was having no part of it, saying:
No no no! I reject this idea that we should just shrug our shoulders and buy the PBS/Buzzfeed line that there’s nothing new here. Stop it! This is news! They didn’t want to talk about it then and they don’t want to talk about it now.
Do you think it’s a coincidence of timing that Barack Obama has now hired people to put out some 17-minute documentary? This is all about Alinskyite control of who tells the story. Well guess what Barack Obama and Jim Messina. It is not all your monopoly anymore and that’s why they are pushing back so hard.
It is not ‘nothing’! It is very crucial!
She kinda took ol’ Juan to the woodshed. He deserves it. Often.
I hope they succeed with continuing his work.
Does anyone know if more is coming out? Is this video part of what Breitbart was going to release or something separate? Lots of confusing information out there right now. Sure would feel a lot better if Breitbart was still around.
Juan gets taken out there a lot. Betcha he has lots of splinters to pick out all the time. I like Juan but he never fully gets a clue. Brainwashing is a powerful thing.
This is from a related article
More Obama Tapes: Michelle Obama a Race Agitating Occupier?
A treasure trove of information is coming out regarding Barack Obama’s time in college. Over at the Breitbart sites, we are learning how Obama inserted himself into a fight to implement hiring on the basis of race at Harvard Law School. The Obama tapes also seem to show the other Obama – Michelle – occupying the Harvard Law School dean’s office. The occupiers were agitating for the race-based hiring of Harvard law professors.
The racialist fight at Harvard Law from 1988 to 1991 swirls around Professor Derrick Bell. As detailed over at Big Government, Professor Bell was a role model to law student Barack Obama. But he also openly advocated for a variety of racialist views wholly outside the American mainstream. Some of them are outright crazy.
You know, it’s probably just a coincidence that EVERY person Obama has ever surrounded himself with is a militant, leftist, radical.
WOW! Malkin looks more beautiful than ever in that video.
If a video surfaced of Obama giving the clenched fist salute in front of posters of Che, Stalin and Huey Newton while sharing a joint with Ayres, Dohrn, Farrakhan, Uncle Ho and Charlie Manson, Juan Williams would say it was just the same ole guilt by association, nuthin’ to see here, move along folks.
You just know that his sole purpose for being on Hannity was to poo-poo the idea that there’s anything to Andrew’s videos. It was great when she put the hammer to that.
He annoys me. There’s no limit to the silly stuff he comes up with to defend Obama. Talk about a spinmeister.
Yessirree. He can spin really hard.
BTTT
...Bell was credited with developing “critical race theory,” which suggested that the U.S. legal system was inherently biased against African Americans and other minorities because it was built on an ingrained white point of view.
...Breitbart’s point of an unvetted president is proven:
At no point in 2008 was the American electorate informed that Obama led a protest on behalf of a law professor who believed that the U.S. legal system was incontrovertibly racist from its moment of creation, or that he thought so well of an outspoken public defender of Louis Farrakhan.
I love Michelle take-no-prisoners Malkin.
If John Boehner had 1/10th the courage she has, the House would be a real force to stymie Obummer’s commie maneuvers.
No, but the press certainly will.
If that would fit in a Tagline, it would be my new one.
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.