Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: IbJensen

Obama is a National Socialist
www.freerepublic.com ^ | October 27, 2008 | Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2116981/posts

Posted on Monday, October 27, 2008 5:19:47 PM by Kevmo

Liberals have become so crass, so ignorant of history, and so idealogically blinded that we can now call them “National Socialists” without them realizing that we just painted them as NAZIs.

We called Obama a socialist because he definitely is one. We’ve been countered with, “What’s wrong with socialism?”

Now we can simply call them National Socialists. They don’t even KNOW we’ve just called them NAZIs. Give it a try and see how it plays. Report back on this thread for others to learn.

What’s wrong with socialism? Monday, October 27, 2008 1:04:01 AM · by Boucheau · 24 replies · 558+ views WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 10/27/2008 | Joseph Farah http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2116233/posts

Will MSM Continue Ignoring Shocking Obama ‘Redistribution of Wealth’ Audio? Monday, October 27, 2008 5:56:38 AM · by St. Louis Conservative · 44 replies · 900+ views Newsbusters ^ | October 27, 2008 | P. J. Gladnick http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2116395/posts

_______________________________________________________

Periodically, when I find myself surrounded by liberals, I have thrown out the blurb that “what we need to do is combine nationalism with socialism and form a national socialist party.” I used to do it just to see how many giggles I’d get, then I started doing it to see if ANYONE would notice what I just promoted. Now what I get is, “That’s a good idea”.

See for yourself, give it a try.


3 posted on 02/19/2012 5:41:50 AM PST by Kevmo (If you can define a man by the depravity of his enemies, Rick Santorum must be a noble soul indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

Throw “labor” in there and you got a trifecta.


8 posted on 02/19/2012 6:05:38 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

I’ve seen a lot of people use that phrase or a variation thereof – usually original is enough to set them off, as though the word “National” somehow modifies the meaning of the word “Socialist”.

Socialism is Socialism no matter if you put National in front of it or not.

But try some these variations I’ve seen around web:

Socialist National Media

Socialists in the National Democratic Party

Democratic National Socialist Committee.

Obummer’s National agenda of Socialism.

Mixing around the words sometimes catches them off guard and they let it go right past them.

Or better yet, use a variation like Socialist National platform and see them get all indigent over it and then realize it’s not the same thing as National Socialist…


98 posted on 02/20/2012 12:59:37 PM PST by Voice of Reason1 (Absolute power corrupts absolutely Lord Acton 1887)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson