To: Drew68
The plaintiffs were offered a default ruling. They turned it down, insisting that evidence be submitted and the case be decided on the merits.
The judge then limited them on the evidence they could offer and then ruled that they did not present enough evidence to be probative and persuasive for the court to consider.
25 posted on
02/05/2012 6:59:22 AM PST by
loucon
To: loucon
The judge then limited them on the evidence they could offer and then ruled that they did not present enough evidence to be probative and persuasive for the court to consider. When you offer "expert" witnesses, they need to have some credentials. The law is pretty clear on this. Orly's "experts" had no qualifications other than the willingness to say what people wanted to hear.
26 posted on
02/05/2012 7:06:22 AM PST by
Drew68
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson