Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
The plaintiffs were offered a default ruling. They turned it down, insisting that evidence be submitted and the case be decided on the merits.

The judge then limited them on the evidence they could offer and then ruled that they did not present enough evidence to be probative and persuasive for the court to consider.
25 posted on 02/05/2012 6:59:22 AM PST by loucon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: loucon
The judge then limited them on the evidence they could offer and then ruled that they did not present enough evidence to be probative and persuasive for the court to consider.

When you offer "expert" witnesses, they need to have some credentials. The law is pretty clear on this. Orly's "experts" had no qualifications other than the willingness to say what people wanted to hear.

26 posted on 02/05/2012 7:06:22 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson