Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bokababe; P-Marlowe

Rand Paul is huge on individual liberty.

Anwar al Awlaki was a U.S. citizen. He was also an anti-US combatant. The nature of the war on terrorism has American citizens killing Americans as did Nidal Hassan at Ft Hood.

The military SHOULD be able to take down terrorists or combat teams infiltrated into the US. How do you write a law in such a way that it gives authority to do ONLY that?

Rand Paul was not mentioned even once in that article.


13 posted on 11/28/2011 2:24:21 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Anwar al Awlaki was a U.S. citizen.
He was also an anti-US combatant.
He was one of the first Americans executed by this President without trial.

We expect a President who has a history of “over-reach” in almost everything he touches, not to “over-reach” on this issue ? Co-signed by McCain at Obummers request ?

He won’t even send National Guard to protect the Southern border to stop an invasion of drugs, alien immigrants, or weapons . Instead , he puts up 15 highway signs to warn U.S. citizens to seek an alternative route, due to danger from drug cartels , and illegal immigration routes, and while he and the Department of “Just-us” promotes and arms the drug cartels . WHAT ARE YOU ... NUTS ???

I dont trust either major party with this authority to arrest and detain without trial, much less use the military as “enforcers “.
I dont trust either major party with this authority to abbrogate the Consitution , or re-write it , or modify it.
TRUST is something that you earn , and so far , I haven’t seen anything out of this administration that is worthy of TRUST .


47 posted on 11/28/2011 3:11:22 PM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt ( (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11) by GlockThe Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

That is why we have police and the FBI. There is no reason for the military to be involved. I dont forsee any reason that a Tomahawk cruise missile will be needed to go through a front door in America.


56 posted on 11/28/2011 4:12:49 PM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
The military SHOULD be able to take down terrorists or combat teams infiltrated into the US. How do you write a law in such a way that it gives authority to do ONLY that?

That is why we have Sheriff's Offices, police departments and National Guard.

82 posted on 11/29/2011 6:52:58 PM PST by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson