Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flat Tax Philosophy
American Thinker ^ | November 19, 2011 | Scott A. Mahrle

Posted on 11/20/2011 8:32:14 AM PST by Scott Mahrle

The problem is that we conservative economic thinkers have gotten ourselves into a bungle by playing on the liberals' playing field. We have accepted that government goods are to be valued for each of us individually as a function of our income.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/11/flat_tax_philosophy.html#ixzz1eGOEp4K0

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: equality; flattax; government; progressivism
My article was published in American Thinker yesterday.
1 posted on 11/20/2011 8:32:16 AM PST by Scott Mahrle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scott Mahrle

Excellent work. Thank you


2 posted on 11/20/2011 8:34:39 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott Mahrle
We have accepted that government goods are to be valued for each of us individually as a function of our income.

The absurdity of the idea that people with higher incomes should pay higher taxes is best understood by considering to cab drivers. One works eight hours a day, and the other works twelve hours a day but otherwise they lead identical lives. What possible moral justification could there be for the one who contributes less (in terms of providing service to others) to be rewarded by having to pay less in taxes than the hard working cabbie?

Of course the tax payment would have to be set at some amount that some people would be unable to pay, but those who do not pay it should not be allowed to vote.

ML/NJ

3 posted on 11/20/2011 9:29:50 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
two cab drivers !
4 posted on 11/20/2011 9:34:21 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scott Mahrle
Obviously, a tax amount small enough that it could be paid by everyone, when added up, would not be nearly enough to fund all the goods provided by the government today. So much the better. On this system, government would be required to live within its proper limits

Congratulations on being published. Here's where it falls apart, though. We need to do something about this:

Article 1, Sec 8:

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

And this:

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, (I refer to the Federal Reserve system)

Until we do, your notion that insufficient revenues will lead to austerity or fiscal discipline is a pipedream, totally at odds with experience.

5 posted on 11/20/2011 9:44:25 AM PST by Huck (LIBERTY is the object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott Mahrle
Income taxes are evil, whether they be flat or progressive, the idea of taxing people on what they earn is against the very idea of freedom, ditto property taxes. Our founders knew of the evil of income taxes(hence the need for the sixteenth amendment)but failed when it came to property taxes. The idea that a person should be taxed simply for owning a home is ridiculous and totalitarian in the extreme.

Eliminate property taxes and income taxes, do away with the welfare system and public schools and spend federal taxes on what the constitution allows and nothing else.

6 posted on 11/20/2011 10:03:26 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson