Replies

I am not the one making extraordinary claims. The entirety of my argument is that the thermodynamic measurements are relatively simple and can be expressed in everyday terms that people are familiar with, say KWh. It is entirely possible to construct an unambiguous experiment that would conclusively prove Rossi's theories without revealing the contents of the magic box. This has not been done and seeing that it is the first and simplest experiment to do one has to wonder why.

So, to answer you question a bit more directly, no, I don't want to root about looking for the hidden information that should have been published up front. I have things to do that I can actually make work. My whole purpose here is to try and affect locally the abysmal state of what is referred to in the mass media as "critical thinking".

"This has not been done and seeing that it is the first and simplest experiment to do one has to wonder why."

If you will actually look at the reports, you will see that what you want has indeed been done. Apparently, you have bought into the FUD arguments that have been circulated/circulating. The arguments brought forth about those demonstrations are BS from one end to the other. ONE legitimate criticism was made, and that was about the "wet vs.dry" steam notion from the first two demos. That was verfied as "not happening" in the third demo, which was run so as not to generate steam. And, in actual fact, the third demo was un-necessary, as the criticism about the methodology used to measure "steam quality" in the first two demos was also wrong.

But the data is there.

"So, to answer you question a bit more directly, no, I don't want to root about looking for the hidden information that should have been published up front.

You don't have to "root about". I've told you where the reports are available. In abbreviated form in the "News" section, and in full in the "Library" section of LENR-CANR.ORG.