Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

15 Trillion Dollars In Debt, 45 Million Americans On Food Stamps And Zero Solutions On The Horizon
TEC ^ | 11-3-2011

Posted on 11/02/2011 10:30:58 PM PDT by blam

15 Trillion Dollars In Debt, 45 Million Americans On Food Stamps And Zero Solutions On The Horizon

November 3, 2011

How does a country end up 15 trillion dollars in debt? 30 years ago, we were just a little over a trillion dollars in debt. How in the world do supposedly rational people living in "the greatest nation on earth" allow themselves to commit national financial suicide by allowing government debt to explode like that? It almost seems like there should be some sort of official ceremony in Washington D.C. to commemorate this achievement.
It really takes something special to be able to roll up 15 trillion dollars of debt. To get to this level, we really had to indulge in some wild spending. For example, did you know that the U.S. national debt grows by more than 2 million dollars every single minute? All of this debt has fueled an unprecedented boom of prosperity for the last 30 years, but now that prosperity is drying up.
Today, there are over 45 million Americans that are on food stamps. America is being deindustrialized at a blinding pace and there are not nearly enough jobs for everyone. Poverty is exploding all over the nation, and millions of families have lost their homes to foreclosure. Unfortunately, there are zero solutions on the horizon. The leaders of both major political parties seem even more clueless right now than in past years. We really could use some hope, but hope is in very short supply.

When evaluating the health of America's economy, it is important not to look at the short-term numbers. Rather, the key is to look at the long-term trends and the balance sheet numbers.

For example, if a mother and a father gave their teenage kids a bunch of credit cards and told them to go out and buy whatever they wanted, that would create a lot of "economic activity", but it would also send that family to the poorhouse really quickly.

Well, we have basically done the same thing as a nation. We are drowning in debt, and all of this debt is going to destroy us financially.

Unfortunately, the federal government continues to spend money as if there was no tomorrow. Right now, spending by the federal government accounts for about 24 percent of GDP. Back in 2001, it accounted for just 18 percent.

When you are running up a credit card, it can be a lot of fun and it can seem like there aren't any consequences.

But when it comes to debt, there are always consequences. The following is what former Republican Senator Alan Simpson (of the Simpson-Bowles Commission) recently had to say about the horrific debt crisis we are currently facing....

"It's very simple. If you spend more than you earn, you lose your butt"

In the United States, we love to have the government spend money on all sorts of things, but we never want to pay for it.

So the debt just keeps piling up higher and higher.

A lot of Republicans say that spending on social programs has gotten out of control. A lot of Democrats say that spending on the military has gotten out of control.

They are both right. As I have written about previously, the U.S. military accounts for close to half of all the military spending in the world. In fact, U.S. military spending is greater than the military spending of the next 15 countries combined.

Yes, we will always need a very powerful military, but we can have one without going broke in the process.

But an even larger problem is our rampant spending on social programs.

The following comes from a recent article by Janet Tavakoli....

In 1950 spending for social programs was only one percent of the total Federal Budget. As the economy grew, social programs expanded to include Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Unemployment Compensation, Supplemental Security for the Disabled, and educational programs. In 1983 as the United States pulled out of an ugly recession and brought inflation under control, social programs consumed 26% of the budget. In fiscal year 2012, they’ll eat up an estimated 57% of the budget.

Tens of millions of Americans have become absolutely addicted to government money. Nobody ever wants "their government benefits" to be cut, but nobody ever seems to want to have their taxes raised to pay for them.

To get a really good idea of how government transfer payments have absolutely skyrocketed over the years, just check out this chart.

Obviously, the course that we are on is not anywhere close to sustainable.

To say that the "war on poverty" was a failure would be a huge understatement.

The more money we seem to spend on social programs, the more that poverty seems to grow.

Right now, there are over 45 million Americans on food stamps. The economy is supposed to be "recovering", but the number of Americans on food stamps has grown by over 8 percent in just the past year.

Food stamps are the modern equivalent of the old-fashioned bread lines. The federal government is now feeding an almost unbelievable number of Americans.

According to the Wall Street Journal, nearly 15 percent of all Americans are now on food stamps. That means that approximately one out of every seven Americans is dependent on the federal government for food.

That is not just a crisis - that is a total nightmare.

So what can be done?

Well, we certainly shouldn't let our people starve in the streets.

But handouts should only be a temporary solution.

What these people really need are good jobs. Unfortunately, our "leaders" have created a business environment in this country that is incredibly toxic, and they have stood by as millions upon millions of good jobs have been shipped out of the country. That is one of the reasons why I write about the insane trade policies of the globalists over and over and over. The American people need to understand that globalization is going to mean a continuing loss of jobs for this country and it is going to result in the destruction of the middle class.

If we are not going to provide good jobs for American workers, then we are going to have to pay higher taxes in order to feed them and take care of them.

But what happens when the "safety net" breaks?

Even now, a lot of state and local governments all over the country are flat broke and they are cutting back on assistance for the poor.

The following is a brief excerpt from a recent article about this issue that was posted on the Fiscal Times....

For years, hundreds of thousands of people in dire straits – mentally or physically disabled, homeless and unemployed, ineligible for federal welfare, disability, or food subsidies – could generally count on state or local government largesse for modest handouts of cash to help scrape by. Under the rubric of “General Assistance,” these down-and-out Americans received modest payments – often no more than a few hundred dollars a month – to help defray the cost of necessities including rent, food, clothing, toilet paper, aspirin, phone cards, and bus tickets.

But in the midst of the worst recession of modern times and changing attitudes about the poor, many states have been gradually chipping away at general assistance programs or eliminating them altogether. Only 30 of 50 states currently offer any form of general assistance – down from 38 in 1989. And just this week, Washington State formally ended its “Disability Lifeline” program for an estimated 18,000 to 22,000 economically desperate residents.

Sadly, even more of us may be joining the ranks of the poor soon. The layoffs just keep on coming.

Normally, most major store closings do not happen until after the holiday season. You see, the reality is that most troubled retailers tend to want to bring in one more year of holiday sales before they finally shut the doors. If you announce store closings before the holidays, that is going to make holiday shoppers less likely to shop at those stores.

So that is why some of the recent store closing announcements have been so troubling.

For example, it just came out that all 46 Syms and Filene's Basement stores are closing.

Also, Gap recently announced plans to close 189 stores in the United States.

So if this is what we are already seeing now, what is going to happen after the holidays?

That is a very good question.

So many jobs are being lost all around the nation. These days, there is massive competition for just about any job that is available.

People are getting desperate. They just want to be able to pay the bills and take care of their families.

The other day, thousands upon thousands of people lined up to apply for casino jobs in south Florida. Scenes like this are going to become even more frequent in the years ahead.

So do our politicians have any solutions?

Of course not.

The worst of the Republican candidates are actually at the top of the polls. The cold, hard truth is that Romney, Cain and Perry are all clueless when it comes to the economy.

Of course you might as well call Barack Obama "Captain Clueless" when it comes to the economy. Obama keeps giving great speeches about jobs while at the same time signing more "free trade" agreements that will send thousands more businesses and millions more jobs out of the country. Even the CEOs on Obama's jobs creation panel are shipping huge numbers of jobs out of the United States.

Obama gave a speech in Washington D.C. today that exemplified his clueless approach to the economy. During the speech, Obama made the following statement....

"If Congress tells you they don't have time, they got time to do it. We've been in the House of Representatives, what have you guys been debating? John, you've been debating a commemorative coin for baseball? You have legislation reaffirming that In God We Trust is our motto. That's not putting people back to work. I trust in God, but God wants to see us help ourselves by putting people back to work"

First of all, Obama is not putting people back to work. He has been helping big corporations ship jobs out of the country at a record pace.

Secondly, how does he know what God wants?

A lot of people actually think that the phrase "God helps those who help themselves" is in the Bible.

But it isn't.

A while after the Obama speech, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney made matters worse when he told reporters the following....

"I believe the phrase from the Bible is 'The Lord helps those who help themselves"

But once again, there is no such verse in the Bible.

Okay, so quoting a "mystery verse" from the Bible is not that big of a thing at the end of the day, but this is yet another example of how the Obama administration just can't seem to get anything right.

Look, everyone makes mistakes once in a while. I know that I certainly do.

But when you are wrong about almost everything almost all of the time, that is a major problem.

Especially when you are the president of the United States.

But both political parties are to blame for the mess that we are in. Budget deficits exploded during Republican administrations just like they have under the Democrats.

Both political parties are responsible for us being 15 trillion dollars in debt.

Both political parties are responsible for 45 million Americans being on food stamps.

Both political parties are responsible for the fact that there are not nearly enough good jobs.

If Barack Obama, Mitt Romney or Rick Perry is elected in 2012, we are just going to have more of the same.

America is running out of time. If we are going to change course, we need to do it immediately.

The borrower is the servant of the lender. We are enslaving ourselves and we are enslaving future American generations by going into so much debt.

Shame on the politicians that have rolled up so much debt in our name and shame on us for continuing to send those same politicians back to Washington D.C. time after time after time.

It is so sad to watch what is happening to America.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: depression; economyrecovery; recession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2011 10:31:05 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Fabian Socialism or Marxism?

The implementation methods differ

The end result is the same.


2 posted on 11/02/2011 10:44:15 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Did you hear that Lindsay Lohan is going back to jail?


3 posted on 11/02/2011 10:45:39 PM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

4 posted on 11/02/2011 10:47:04 PM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

No, but the really important thing is what kind of nonsexual gesture did Herman Cain make 15 years ago.


5 posted on 11/02/2011 10:51:28 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is what happens when SEIU and democRats are running the White House and Congress....that Trillion dollar stimulus all went to save union jobs. And the 800 Billion TARP went to save the greedy Goldman Sachs and other gambling banks.
6 posted on 11/02/2011 10:54:00 PM PDT by federal__reserve (Dr. Paul Volcker, the best Chairman of federal Reserve in 50 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: federal__reserve

There have been trillions of dollars spent overseas. If all the money was spent here, we wouldn’t be so deeply in debt.

BHO2 loves to give away the hard-earned money of Americans. He hates this country, and the people in it.


7 posted on 11/02/2011 10:59:03 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

There are solutions to this problem.

Unfortunately, the solutions needed require the character traits of the American people living at the time of the Revolution.


8 posted on 11/02/2011 11:08:32 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I don’t think it’s simple. Spending our way out of debt has worked before, why not again? Well maybe there are reasons, but I think they are systemic, or maybe even cosmic. That is to say, we are in new territory now. I think there are similarities to the Great Depression. I recall a speech by Hoover ( I think ) when he cited the cause as “overproduction, overproduction, and overproduction”. ( Maybe that was an earlier episode. ) Anyway, we don’t think of overproduction now, but we do have incredible efficiency, which amounts to the same thing since it devalues labor. This gets into the whole commie thing. Heilbroner in his famous “Wordly Philopsophers”, opined that Marx had given a brilliant critique of capitalism when he described what he saw as its ultimate fate, a death struggle among surviving corporations to reduce cost of production, to the detriment of the laboring class, of course. I always thought that Marx failed to account for technological expansion, which always provides new frontiers for exploitation, where capitalism excels.

Before Marx there was H. G. Wells, in The World Set Free, where he imagined cheap nuclear energy ruining heavy industry. Has the internet created the real life version of these events? Have we actually entered a new age where capitalism must falter? Who knows! Who Cares! Tune in next week. Same Fire time, same Fire station!


9 posted on 11/02/2011 11:16:20 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Spend more on poverty, you get more of it.

I don’t have a problem with private charitable assistance. It used to be the Church responsible.

And when the state has spent itself into oblivion, it will be the Church responsible again. The wheel turns.


10 posted on 11/02/2011 11:21:56 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

Nonsense. Efficiency is not the problem.

The problem is that demand is not there.

You cannot abort 50 million children and expect for there to be no consequences.


11 posted on 11/02/2011 11:23:26 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Krugman Warns of “Gigantic Bank Run”, “Emergency Bank Closing” and “New Lira”
12 posted on 11/02/2011 11:23:51 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: BenKenobi
You cannot abort 50 million children and expect for there to be no consequences.

That's a point, but it only serves to show that capitalism is predicated on growth, which essentialy implies an exponential growth of the population. We're at 7 billion, so how far can it grow? 70 bilion? 700 billion? 7 trillion? Surely not. To argue that 7 billion is not the limit is a quibble. This is already way beyond anything Malthus imagined, I'm sure, but the limit has got to be around here somewhere.

15 posted on 11/02/2011 11:51:49 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
When preparing for a crash, the best thing to do is eat a Twizzler.
16 posted on 11/02/2011 11:54:44 PM PDT by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

You are quite right that capitalism is predicated on growth. Think about that for a moment.

What do you think happens when growth is no longer there? What do you think happens to capitalism?

As for Malthus, his arguments rest on one premise, that food production is an independent variable from the size of the population. But we know that this is not so. Like anything, the laws of supply and demand dictate that when demand rises, so does supply. When demand falls, so does supply in response.

Ergo, as most foodstuffs are inelastic goods, the production of food is a dependent and not an independent variable. We would expect greater land cultivation in response to greater demand. Which is what we do see. We would expect as the price of food goes up, that new technologies become viable in the production of food. Things like mechanical harvesting. Reducing the labor costs makes food that much more cheaper and increases yield.

If someone asked a man in the middle ages, how high that a man could climb, do you think any would believe it to be possible for a man to climb to the other side of the moon?

The only limitation on food production is really the cost of energy. With sufficient energy and low enough costs, you can grow sufficient food to feed the population.


17 posted on 11/03/2011 12:00:32 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

So you think 7 trillion people can live on the earth, along with trees and birds and all that good stuff, no problem?


18 posted on 11/03/2011 12:10:29 AM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
Spending our way out of debt has worked before, why not again?

Because we are being governed by a bunch of crony crooks. Crony socialists and crony capitalists. They have few morals and make decisions based on feelings. Just look at all the money wasted on green technology companies now routinely going bust. A streamlined and profitable civilization does not need growth to sustain itself. Only a civilization riddled with parasites and flat out crooks needs constant growth to sustain itself.

Without that growth, there is only one option available for the cronies. War. Destruction of the excess baggage.

19 posted on 11/03/2011 12:16:37 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

We have an ever expanding government consisting of union members, supporting the illegal aliens, fighting over the dwindling number of taxpayers and their dollars.

We have illegal aliens without any documented (key word; documented) income after those taxpayer dollars.

And then we have the baby boomer taxpayers that are coming up to retirement age. They will cease to be taxpayers and claim their Social Security benefits.

Something is wrong here.

Give it a little thought, nearly 50 percent of Californian kids are English learners. That means we hired twice as many teachers as we should have. Extrapolate that to everything the government does.

Twice the people that we would normally need working for 25 or 30 years and living the next 20 or 30 years at near the same income level.

It takes 30 tax payers to provide the income of a government employee when he retires.


20 posted on 11/03/2011 12:19:12 AM PDT by Haddit (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson