Posted on 08/15/2011 1:01:37 PM PDT by charlene4
Tim Adams was the Senior Elections Clerk for the city and county of Honolulu during the 2008 presidential election. Tim was the person who told the media that there was no long form birth certificate for Barack Obama in Hawaii, and that it was common knowledge by all of the officials there. In his position, he had a staff of about fifty people who were in charge of verifying voter eligibility. He stated in his thesis that he had access to all the usual government databases to verify voter identities. They had access to databases such as NCIS, Social Security, and others. He does not say that he looked up information for Barack Obama, just that the group had access to information.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Seems to me this calls for an investigation or something.
But.. but..
There WAS an official Hawaii BC.
All 7 layers of it.
bookmark
Mmmmmm seven layers....
Now THAT's the way to get Barry to eat his peas.
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/PTO/Dip/Infamy.html
Interesting read.
Thanks for posting my article that was picked up in part by ORYR.
The original article is at the following URL for WTPOTUS.
Connecticut Social Security number issue: Although I don't like Obama, I wonder why the first 3 digits of former President Eisenhower's Social Security number refer to California, when Eisenhower was living in Pennsylvania when he applied to Social Security in 1962?
Recently, I accidentally ran across Pro-Obama messages on the internet that point to Eisenhower's Social Security number mix-up as proof that the Social Security administration may have also made a simple mistake when it assigned Hawaii resident teenager Obama a Connecticut number in the 1970s, when Hawaii resident teenager Obama should have received a Hawaii number back in the 1970s.
I'm confused.
Could someone help me? Thanks.
Ikes SSN was Ikes .... Obama’s is not only wrong state but previously issued.
At least Eisenhower was stationed in California at one time. Perhaps he got his SSN then.
From the SSA website:
“Prior to 1973, social security numbers were assigned by our field offices. The number merely established that his/her card was issued by one of our offices in that State.”
http://www.ssa.gov/employer/stateweb.htm
Here is a 1962 article on President Eisenhower’s vacation plans.
Here is a news story about President Kennedy visiting former President Eisenhower in Palm Springs, CA in March, 1962.
http://itssosunny.tumblr.com/post/6637388225/john-f-kennedy-meets-with-dwight-d-eisenhower-at
Finally, here is info on a post card sent from Mrs. Eisenhower to a Mrs. McCracken from Palm Desert, CA on April 24, 1962 (page 3 last entry).
http://www.gettysburg.edu/dotAsset/643822.pdf
Apparently, the Eisenhowers were in the Palm Springs, CA area from Feburary to April, 1962.
President Eisenhower’s SS-5 is dated 4/10/1962. The assumption would be that he visited the local SS office in Palm Springs, CA.
The Obamanuts ended up backtracking that as they found out Eisenhower actually did indeed apply for his social security number in California.
President Eisenhower’s SS-5 is dated 4/10/1962. The assumption would be that he visited the local SS office in Palm Springs, CA.
******
Thanks for your help. It looks like the pro-Obama people conveniently forgot to check on where President Eisenhower was when he filled out his Social Security application.
From the information you posted, it looks like Eisenhower had been in California for a few months in 1962 when he applied to Social Security, and that is the reason why he has a California number instead of a Pennsylvania number.
It is now going on 4 months—and counting—since President Obama released his Hawaii long form birth certificate to the world on April 27, 2011, but still not a single word from Kapiolani Hospital officials to verify that yes indeed, President Obama was born there on Aug.4, 1961, as it is stated on President Obama’s long form birth certificate.
It is as if Kapiolani officials have gone into hiding.
President Obama could quickly thrust a deadly dagger into the heart of birther nation today by simply allowing Kapiolani officials to let reporters examine his birth records from 1961, but he hasn’t done so.
Why is President Obama playing hardball when it comes to the release of his Kapiolani 1961 records?
Is the reason a simple one: President Obama was not born at Kapiolani Hospital as he claims, so there are no 1961 Obama or Dunham records to examine?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.