Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Comments?
1 posted on 07/30/2011 10:52:27 AM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Rodm
Probably so, on "out in the open" spending.

But I believe that various emergency spending bills, totally hundreds of billions of dollars were also passed in some weird way - only Congress knows how - to finance all the Iraq war expenses, plus Afghanistan, and many other types of War on Terror budgeted items.

So we'd actually have to go back quite a bit farther in time, if we put EVERYTHING on the table right now.

2 posted on 07/30/2011 10:56:19 AM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

Hopeless - you’d be lucky to get half of the old people on just this site to give up the amount of Social Security and Medicare money necessary to bring spending down to that level. You can only imagine the general public at large...


3 posted on 07/30/2011 10:57:16 AM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

For starters, interest on the debt is a much larger amount than in 2005. Also, the proPortion of ss recipients vs Payors has gone from black to red. Those two facts alone make the goal unachievable.


4 posted on 07/30/2011 10:58:17 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

Dems would say if I don’t pay my credit card with my other credit card I will run out of money.
We say stop borrowing and pay it off.


7 posted on 07/30/2011 11:04:28 AM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

First, the result would be layoffs from Northern Virginia, D.C., Baltimore up to Wilmington and beyond and severe economic recession for that entire area.

States in financial trouble like California and Illinois and cities such as New York, Chicago, Philly, Boston, and others would also have to institute huge cutbacks and their economies would tank.

That’s all short-term and is the medicine we need, but because so much the political power is concentrated in those areas, your commonsense solution will not happen.


8 posted on 07/30/2011 11:08:30 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm
This issue is not about common sense. It's a fundamental disagreement between the shape, scope and goal of government. What you're suggesting is basically a bread and water diet to RINO statists and a noose to Democrat progressives.

They're more than happy to throw the fortunes of America's grandchildren into the furnace, in order to fuel their reelection chances today.

That philosophy is the enemy. Fix that, and the math will fix itself.

9 posted on 07/30/2011 11:09:11 AM PDT by Steel Wolf ("Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Gaius Sallustius Crispus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

THIS WOULD MAKE TOO MUCH SENSE FOR WASHINGTON

What now one has mentioned over the last few weeks is that government spending AUTOMATICALLY goes up 8% per year.

Just by FREEZING IT we could balance the budget in 8 years


14 posted on 07/30/2011 11:23:58 AM PDT by Mr. K (CAPSLOCK! -Unleash the fury! [Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm
There's a way to cut spending very effectively: the One Percent Spending Reduction Act of 2011 (H.R. 1848/S. 1316), which would cut baseline spending one percent per year starting in 2012 all the way to 2018. This plan is good enough that we could erase the budget deficit by 2018.
15 posted on 07/30/2011 11:26:04 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

Does anyone think we didn’t have enough government in 2005?


17 posted on 07/30/2011 11:28:57 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

The house should pass a continuing resolution tommorow that funds the govt at 90% of present level and suspends baseline raises in funding. They should not wait until september 25th when Obama comes in with his hair on fire screaming something has to be done by the evil repubs. Pass it tommorow and issue a statement that if the senate doesn’t like it to get off their dead asses and engage in the budget debate.


19 posted on 07/30/2011 11:36:47 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin ("Credit is the ruination of a nation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

You are correct obviously.

Unfortunately it would also require cuts in SS and Medicare. It would require a 44% cut in defense. When I bring up cutting SS, I get “well I paid into it and want my money back.” When I bring up cutting Medicare I get accused of wanting death panels. Similarly when talking about cutting defense, people talk as if that is equivalent to surrendering to AQ.

Welcome to the obvious budget cutting club. You have at least one FRiend.


20 posted on 07/30/2011 11:40:48 AM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rodm

Back to August 2001 levels would be preferable.


22 posted on 07/30/2011 3:22:44 PM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson