Posted on 06/24/2011 8:57:48 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
Indeed! I can let a misused homonym ("seen of the crime"), an accidental Malapropism ("Wall Street typhoon"), or a Spoonerism (e.g., "White Horse souse") by without a comment - they're totally forgivable, since in most cases the "culprit" is guilty only of haste. The same is true of banal typos.
But illogic in official letters?! And willful, self-serving illogic?
Fail!
Regards,
Huh? Can you rewrite that?
Obama has shown that the best way to be elected is to have NO accomplishments in legislation. As I Said the Republican candidate in and of themselves is irrelevant. The only relevance is the perceived success or failure of Obama in his first term.
If Republicans nominate a vanilla moderate they have LESS of a chance of winning due to the inability to draw a sharp contrast to Obama.
Nobody cares about her legislative history beyond her voting record which is strongly Conservative. That is all that matters.
I could, if you would give me a hint what your problem with it is. Is it the syntax? The diction? The reading level? Would you like me to use simpler, shorter words?
Regards,
Spot on.
Since this is freerepublic, What are the conservative politics?
I’m sorry, that is not very convincing.
If you want to sell product, you have to do better than that.
I am not on her band wagon, I am however much more for her than against her.
Like I said, this is all irrelevant. It is about Obama. ANY of the Republicans could beat him if the economy continues in it's present state. A strong Conservative simply has a much better chance than a moderate, regardless of what the conventional wisdom says. They are rarely correct , EVER.
Given the option, I would prefer to have Palin, Cain, Bachmann,
I am not trying to convince you of anything, I am stating the facts. Convincing you of anything is irrelevant to the truth. It is what it is.
Obama is up for re-election. He is the focus, ANY Conservative will roll over him if the economy is bad. A RINO will have more difficulty. Romney is a RINO, Huntsman is a RINO. I will not vote for them in the primary.
I keep asking about Michelle Bachmann, it seems that are only barely aware, that she even exists.
What exactly are you asking?
I could, if you would give me a hint what your problem with it is. Is it the syntax? The diction? The reading level? Would you like me to use simpler, shorter words?
ansel12:
Since this is freerepublic, What are the conservative politics?
alexander_busek:
You asked for a rewrite, and I said that I was willing to oblige, if you would only tell me what you found wrong with my initial post.
Now you (apparently - your post doesn't make it very clear) lament the lack of "conservative politics" (in my post?).
I'm not prepared to play "cat-and-mouse" with you.
State, plainly, your specific objections to my individual assertions, opinions, or observations, and I will respond to... Oh, forget it; you are wasting my time.
Regards,
To: Jim from C-Town
She is a sitting congressperson and a busy one at that. She actually works on legislation, unlike others who simply seat warm.
What is her record in that area, is it strong?
Well, she certainly should have known that, after having served his sentence, he'd get into trouble again years later. What's wrong with her that she can't look into the future?
Huckabachmannabee
Bad pardoning judgment
Do you jump to every libtard pulling of your gstring?
This is a LIBERAL HIT PIECE - DONT FALL FOR IT
Absolutely. She certainly should have been able to foresee that he'd get into trouble again years later. </sarcasm>
I’m with you- maybe we should ask the reporter who dug up this “bombshell” to take a poll of all 57 states about how they feel.
Or ask the dead guy who got the medal for valor..
Also bad Rollins judgment.
This would be significant if and only if (that's not a malapropism on my part, either; it is a formal logical term) it had ever been claimed, or if it were generally believed, that lawyers as a group know how to write.
You would have a much more powerful post if you were to focus on the purely ethical impropriety. Your sentence
"It was none of those things that I found so egregious, because politicians typically engage in such shenanigans on a daily basis, and Michele Bachmann is nothing if not a typical politician."
is really the most damning one of all for Michele's electoral prospects, and it ought to become the topic sentence for your newly-rewritten essay.
Cheers!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.