Posted on 06/18/2011 11:55:46 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
This article is my re-write of an article from The American Thinker which purports to act as a "heart-to-heart" from one intelligent, conservative girl to her peers as to why Sarah is just too, well, icky to be President.
Cheers!
Romney or Rove or someone must be getting desperate, ALL the secondary sites are running the "everyone *really* *really* *honestly* loathes Palin, so she can't win" idea.
Cheers!
A Jealous Woman's Problem with Sarah Palin (rejoinder to Linda Fritsch)
Romney or Rove or someone must be getting desperate, ALL the secondary sites are running the "everyone *really* *really* *honestly* loathes Palin, so she can't win" idea.
Thanks, grey_whiskers.
Good post, whiskers.
Please tell me you wore a frumpy full length skirt, didn't shave your legs, sipped cosmopolitans, and wrote in black face.
Oh yeah,... and it was your time of month...
Fritsch is a *conservative* cross between whoopi goldberg and michele obama AND she is a radio host in, of all places, Austin, Texas. Perry possibly eyeing a candidacy couldn’t possibly have had anything to do with her hit piece, I am sure.
Having said that, here is a repost I just posted a few minutes ago on what is probably a dead thread this late/early:
Sunday, June 19, 2011 3:59:05 AM · 8 of 8
MestaMachine to techno
I have spent the better part of four hours tonight reading up on the “rising star” and seeming adoration of “conservatives” for michele bachmann, romney’s secret anti-palin weapon. It’s been odd because what I see is a michele bachmann who wanted and coveted the position as the face of the Tea Party, but couldn’t quite pull it off because michele is in a narrow niche and Sarah Palin is national, even global.
bachmann stands for bachmann. Palin stands for America. It’s that simple.
Bachmann could not have gone to NC and helped elect Nicky Haley like Sarah did, but Palin could go to MN and help elect michele bachmann...who is so loyal she has her campaign manager stabbing Sarah in the back.
So bachmann is using daggers and cliches to sound like a candidate using 30 second soundbites but displaying not ONE qualification to be president except she is a woman as if that very thing completely negates the “need” for a Sarah Palin candidacy . oh boy. I would bet right here and right now, that if it had been bachmann who was in NH the day romney announced, no one would have even known it.
Sarah Palin is the ONLY Conservative who has actually challenged romneycare and state mandates. Even Pawlenty who has barked like a poodle about obamneycare refused to pursue it.
Here is the gist. There is NO RACE right now. GOP is salivating at perry possibly jumping in, and maybe THAT would solve the Palin problem. Perry is GWB with better hair. It is almost comical to see the stalwarts of *compassionate conservatism* with their tongues hanging out drooling at the perry prospect.
NONE of them realize that the more they try to diminish Palin, the more they build her up.
I am reminded of scenes from movies where guerilla armies have dug into the ground in open fields and covered themelves with sod, hid in trees and brush quietly, quietly awaiting an advancing enemy marching confidently to what they perceived was certain victory.
Meanwhile, they do not seem to realize that we are in a REVOLUTION and we are keeping our powder dry, staying quietly in our homes and leaving extra money in our checking accounts, waiting to volunteer and hit the streets running when the call comes in every state, every nook and cranny. We are an army and we will make damned sure that Sarah Palin remains UNDEFEATED.
Thank you sir! I enjoyed the rewrite and wholeheartedly agree, but I still hate cats...
Cheers!
JC
No wonder there have been some nasty tornadoes this year--It isn't "climate change", it's just the slipstream from all that circular reasoning...
So far, she beats anyone in the field, hands down with me. If she doesn't run, I'll be stuck with my second choice (at least for the primaries).
The pollsters hand-pick 500, 1000, or 1200 people to continuously "sample", delete the data spikes that don't uphold the results they are paid to produce, then report their garbage as if it were divine revelation. It's still B.S. Luckily for the pollsters, the vast majority of sheeple have never endured a college statistics class.
Here's a poll taken from a sample of 8713 (and expandable) of a huge population, Facebook. With 500 million uniquely identified members, 150 million from the USA, allowing no multiple votes, allowing no deleting of data spikes, here's what you get.
Should Sarah Palin run for office in 2012?
Votes: 8713
61% Yes, Sarah Palin should run for office in 2012.
37% No, Sarah Palin should not run for office in 2012.
1% I don't know. Please see my answer below.
I like that better than the libspew...(8^D)
Just because you are fat, ugly, and lazy, don’t take it out on Sarah!
You meant SC, not NC.
Sorry. Heat o’the moment. You knew what I meant.
We MUST run a conservative
We must run someone that can speak plain english
We must run someone that the media hates.
That way you know there is something good about them.......
I read her screed.
Quite honestly, this broad sounds like a kook.
I am loving that poll. Did you notice that at least half of the first few comments were by people for whom English was not their first languge? LOL
Austin is quite liberal and is affectionately known as Berkeley East.
This, I know. That’s why I mentioned it. KLBJ Talk Radio.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.