Posted on 06/09/2011 10:11:36 AM PDT by Kaslin
Saw on Drudge they used a swat to raid a guy over unpaid student loans.
So they want non thinking gorillas, there's a shocker there....sarcasm intended
Link to another SWAT blunder, served a warrant issued by the Dept of Education over student loans. http://www.news10.net/news/article/141108/2/Questions-surround-feds-raid-of-Stockton-home
Well, yes. That's true. But the real problem (as seen in the Guerena case) is that SWAT seem to have been given de facto power of life and death. Have any members of that murderous death-squad been charged yet?
And now SWAT are being used for debt collection! No matter how well trained they are, that is wrong.
Well, if we must have them, how about restricting them to one state-run team per state? Surely the real need for SWAT support is so uncommon that one team per state - and a standby helicopter to transport them - would suffice?
Most SWAT teams should be disbanded. They create more problems than they solve. Maybe a State level SWAT team would work. Major cities might need one if crime is out of control. Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, Miami?
And let's not forget this jack-booted thug.
Yeah, but it was his estranged wife’s unpaid student loans. He didn’t even know where she lived
I’m increasingly hearing the term swat team used as a verb. As in, they swat-teamed him.
Not a good trend.
Even better eh, weren’t swat teams supposed to be used for high risk events and not bill collecting?
The guy could have easily been killed, not to mention his dogs.
oh cmon now, what the heck would they do with all those toys?
You better watch out, they might just start swat-teaming people for wrong thinking.
SWAT teams need to go, period.
The Case for SWAT Teams (Mend them, don't end them.)
So much bull shit, so little time.
It is not just Swat that seem to have been given de facto power of life and death, look at the Las Vegas Costco killing. Remember police are not your friend.
No Unreasonable Search And Seizure
No Cruel And Unusual Punishment
So, which prevail in the end?
That and the fact that after receiving all their new shiny "toys" from Uncle Sam, they are like little boys on Christmas morning and can't wait to use them...even if in situations which are uncalled for.
They need to be held accountable for their actions and whatever government body in which they are located should enact some very strict guidelines when they can be deployed.
Secondly, they should be afforded no immunity for their conduct and if thru negligence or over enthusiasm, cause destruction of property or harm innocent individuals, they should be held PERSONALLY liable as well as jointly with the local/state government.
Also, if they operate in an honorable and prescribed manner, WHY need to hide (like cowards or terrorists) their identities by wearing masks?
Waaaaaay too many have let their power go to their heads as they know regardless of their actions (they mostly have unfettered power of life and death over those they "target") very, very few are held accountable for their actions.
IMHO, it will take several incidents whereby a homeowner decides (RIGHTLY) to protect his castle and some of these "Cowboy Jackbooted Thugs" begin to get carried out in body bags for any serious thought and discussions of their usefulness to be reconsidered.
A full time SWAT team with nothing to do but train most of the time would appear to be a costly problem waiting to happen. SWAT trained and equipped patrol officers assigned on each shift are a sensible alternative, and are less likely to be abused simply because they are readily available.
Click the link to be added to the "Whoops. Sorry, citizen. We thought you were someone else" PING list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.