Posted on 05/16/2011 1:21:38 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
Susan Daniels is a licensed private investigator who has researched the use of the social security number currently being used by Barack Hussein Obama which she has determined was issued in the state of Connecticut, where Obama has neither lived nor worked. Daniels has stated that the number had originally been assigned to a man from Connecticut born in 1890.
Daniels is president of Daniels and Associates Investigations Inc., which is located in Ohio and was incorporated in 1995. Prior to opening her own company, Daniels worked as a private investigator for Friedrick Investigations in Lakewood, OH, including in the areas of medical malpractice, background investigations, and litigation support. She was also employed as a journalist for the Cleveland Plain Dealer for 17 years, covering Board of Health meetings, trials, local county commissioners’ meetings, and performing public records research.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
someone should sue the social security administation and make them talk- they got the goods on obozo- hes probally a illegal alien
I am sure he will come up with a birth certificate saying he was born in Connecticut in 1890 and all the liberals will swear to it.
WTH, just another waste of time. A man like Obama (A man with no compunction toward lying HAO) in the WH with all the powers of the Presidency is not about to be gotten rid of by a few inconsequential facts.
He has a team of lawyers being paid by us to keep him there.
His past WILL become known and then the American people will find out just how big a scam they have been party to. That entire jail the feds want in western Illinois will not be large enough to hold all the co-conspirators in this elaborate scheme to suborn the Constitution and conduct a coup d’etat. They found the black boxes on that Air France crash in the Atlantic. They will find out the data on the pResident too. There are people who know where the ‘bodies are buried’ Someone will become scared enough to talk as a reward for immunity and a new identity.
I love the part where Daniels says Barry has multiple felonies. But then she does not elaborate. I wonder how she found those? Maybe thats why he has to use a fake SS #.
One thing though Barry does own that house in Chicago. I am pretty sure that he and Michelle own that Land Trust compnay that is listed as one of the owners. I had read that they owned that company previously.
Juicy!
I love the part where Daniels says Barry has multiple felonies. But then she does not elaborate. I wonder how she found those? Maybe thats why he has to use a fake SS #.
Call me a dummy, but I don’t understand the story. The number originally was obtained when Barry was 15.
Susan Daniels says it may have been sought by an 87-year-old who needed medical care, i.e., Medicare. But a) why would someone that old/destitute not have applied for SS benefits AND Medicare many years earlier? and b) if that individual HAD applied for benefits, then Social Security Death Index would have recorded when that individual died (surely no one is claiming this 120-year-old individual is still alive).
Then I’m trying to square this with Daniels saying the card wasn’t actually used until 1985. Why would Barack Obama apply for a card at age 15, but not use it for identity until age 27?
Finally, I don’t understand Madelyn Dunham’s role. Leave aside that it’s shocking for someone in such a high position to literally risk her job snooping around in records she knows she shouldn’t, all with the aim of securing an illegal SSN for her grandson. Did Bill Ayers’ quite respectable parents assist HIM in securing fabricated SSNs on behalf of babies who had died? No, it sounds like he did all this dirty work all by himself. Did Madelyn Dunham allegedly do this when Barry was 15? But if he got a card at 15 to use, say for a job, then why doesn’t Daniels’ investigation show any addresses associated with that card between 1977-1985? This goes back to what motivation there would be for securing a card in 1977 that never was going to be used until 1985. It defies logic.
But perhaps I misunderstand the facts in this case.
Where did you come up with that?
b) if that individual HAD applied for benefits, then Social Security Death Index would have recorded when that individual died
No next of kin to report it. M. Dunham was looking for just such a number. It would work for Barry who had a ginned up COLB that was established on her word with the state to gain Barry citizenship at (well, just after) birth. She had means and motive to do both.
The reason these Acorn types have multiple SS numbers is to establish multiple identities so as to get more welfare benefits.
Orly Taitz has filed a lawsuit against the director of the SSA, Michael Astrue as they have refused to release the information she had been requesting.
Orly Taitz has filed a lawsuit against the director of the SSA, Michael Astrue as they have refused to release the information she had been requesting.
Apparently he got a number of new ones in 2008? To bypass Federal Election Law???
The lists are available here
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Taitz-v-Astrue-Exhibit-4B-of-8-to-first-amended-complaint.pdf
Seems too risky at that point, maybe people changing their names?
Call me a dummy, but I don’t understand the story. The number originally was obtained when Barry was 15.
Let me explain. Madelyn would have sought out a SSN for Obama that belonged to a very old gentleman who conveniently had obtained his SSN late in his lifetime. The old folks who transitioned into SS, like my parents who were farmers, had no need for SS until they were eligible to draw SS or needed Medicare/Medicaid) So it is not that unusual that the old gentlemen did not need it until he needed Medicare/Medicaid assistance. Madelyn knew the aged gentleman would likely soon die and this would make his SSN the perfect candidate for a con artist trying to establish a fake identity for her young son. She knew the 1977 date of application for the SSN would fit nicely with Obama’s age of about 15 years and the gentleman’s death would then mean that there would be no overlap in use between Obama and the gentleman. That is why Obama held of on using the SSN until the gentleman died and some time had past after his death.
“That is why Obama held of on using the SSN until the gentleman died and some time had past after his death.”
OK, but if the “gentleman” secured an SSN for a purpose (to obtain Medicare or SSN), then a) how come his death doesn’t show up in SS Death Index? and b) how come Daniels’ searches for residences associated with that SSN don’t reveal any of that gentleman’s residences between 1977 and whatever year he died? I hope you can see why I’m confused.
“The number originally was obtained when Barry was 15.
Where did you come up with that?”
Because the account explicitly says the number was issued in spring 1977, i.e., before Obama’s 16th birthday.
“No next of kin to report it.”
Seriously? So SS is still sending out checks to a guy who died decades ago? The government’s quite inefficient, I concede, but that scenario doesn’t pass the “sniff test.” Likewise, even without kin, the guy had to have died somewhere: in short, he had a death certificate. If he had Medicare in his dying years (that, after all, was the purported reason for his even applying for SS so late in life), then the hospital where he died most certainly would have had his SSN in its records or other parallel proof of Medicare eligibility. What motive would such a facility have had for keeping his SSN off the death certificate?
Moreover, let’s pretend the guy died in the wilderness, no hospital, no medical providers, no death certificate. Then how the hell did Madelyn Dunham know when it was “safe” for BHO to make use of the SSN she secured for him?
“M. Dunham was looking for just such a number. It would work for Barry who had a ginned up COLB that was established on her word with the state to gain Barry citizenship at (well, just after) birth. She had means and motive to do both.”
So Barry didn’t have a job prior to 1985? If so, wouldn’t he have needed an SSN? How could an employer possibly deduct payroll taxes without an SSN? But if he’d somehow managed to secure an SSN for this purpose, then where’s the need to fabricate a new one? The motive here is baffling to me.
I’m not saying there isn’t something extremely odd about this SSN and how it came to be used by BHO. But a hypothesis that involves Madelyn Dunham seems to be severely lacking in common sense. If she’d already succeeded long ago in securing a “legitimate” (or legitimate-seeming) COLB, then there’s no reason to engage in felonious criminal activity by assisting her grandson in securing a fake SSN. The COLB alone would have sufficed to “prove” to SS that he was a legitimate citizen seeking a legitimate SSN etc.
From the article:
“Editor’s Note: The following two paragraphs are the information which Ms. Daniels sent us quoted from Ayers’s Fugitive Dreams:
“After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois and North Dakota,searching for those sad little markers of people born between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but they had never applied for a Social Security card.
“Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.