Posted on 05/11/2011 9:06:15 AM PDT by Smogger
The U.S. Government is determined to put an end to online piracy. In an attempt to give copyright holders and the authorities all the tools required to disable access to so-called rogue sites, lawmakers will soon introduce the PROTECT IP Act. Through domain seizures, ISP blockades, search engine censorship, and cutting funding of allegedly copyright infringing websites, the bill takes Internet censorship to the next level.
Internet censorship is a hot topic this year.
During the past 12 months the U.S. Government seized more than 100 domain names it claimed were promoting copyright infringement. But this was just the beginning. The domain seizures pale in comparison to a bill that’s about to be introduced by U.S. lawmakers.
Dubbed the PROTECT IP Act, the bill will introduce a wide-scale of censorship tools authorities and copyright holders can use to quash websites they claim are facilitating copyright infringement. It is basically a revamped and worsened version of the controversial COICA proposal which had to be resubmitted after its enaction failed last year.
The summary of the bill begins with a recital of the now-standard industry claims about the financial harm caused by copyright infringement. Claims that interestingly enough were put in doubt by the U.S. Government last year, but are still used to push anti-piracy legislation through globally.
“Copyright infringement and the sale of counterfeit goods are reported to cost American creators and producers billions of dollars and to result in hundreds of thousands in lost jobs annually. This pervasive problem has assumed an especially threatening form on the Internet,” the bill document reads.
It is further explained that the PROTECT IP Act is needed as an extension of the already controversial domain seizures. As reported previously, it is now relatively easy for a seized website to continue operating under a new non-US based domain name. With the new bill, however, the authorities and copyright holders have a broader scale of tools they can use.
“The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act (“PROTECT IP Act”) authorizes the Justice Department to file a civil action against the registrant or owner of a domain name that accesses a foreign Internet site, or the foreign-registered domain name itself, and to seek a preliminary order from the court that the site is dedicated to infringing activities,” the document continues.
In case a domain is not registered or controlled by a U.S. company, the authorities can also order search engines to remove the website from its search results, order ISPs to block the website, and order ad-networks and payment processors to stop providing services to the website in question.
“If the court issues an order against the registrant, owner, or domain name, resulting from the DOJ-initiated suit, the Attorney General is authorized to serve that order on specified U.S. based third-parties, including Internet service providers, payment processors, online advertising network providers, and search engines. These third parties would then be required to take appropriate action to either prevent access to the Internet site, or cease doing business with the Internet site.”
Although the above is already quite far-reaching, the bill also allows for private copyright holders to use some of the same tools as the Government. Without due process, copyright holders can obtain a court order to prevent payment providers and ad-networks from doing business with sites that allegedly facilitate copyright infringement. Unlike the DOJ, copyright holders can not obtain orders to block sites through ISPs or search engines.
The summary of the bill does not go into the constitutional issues that arise with several of the measures. However, it ensures that the legislation is in the best interest of the public by protecting people from any website that “endangers the public health.” The only protection for accused websites is that they can “petition the court to suspend or vacate the order,” but lessons from the previous domain seizures show that this process can take up several months.
The PROTECT IP Act is expected to be officially introduced in the coming weeks, and more details will be released at the time. Sources close to the U.S Government say the bill has already gathered a lot of support among legislators, which is a worrying message for the relatively free-Internet as its known today.
I have long said that the lawyers would eventually shut down the internet in the United States, based on copywrite laws.
I use BT to get Game of Thrones because I dont want to give HBO a ratings point. GD obama commie bastards.
Killer desktop wallpaper!
This will be a tool used by Obama “truth squads” to shut down sites that are critical of dear leader in order to “protect the public health”....
Pretty transparent really...
I haven’t seen ever in my life so much effort being taken to protect one small group of people i.e the commies in Hollywood and their sympathizers. It is funny to see lefty limousine liberals screaming for protection when somebody dips the hand in THEIR capital(The people doing this are actually their own ideological cohorts, because most of these pirate seeders are far left wackos)
Looks like going after ‘rogue’ downloaders and making an example out of them didn’t work. So now they have sunk to this.
These pricks are going to suffocate the internet. Pretty soon it is going to become impossible to host or publish a website without breaking some law if these fascists are allowed to do whatever they want without any opposition.
As far as I'm concerned, in a free country, it's the movie and music industry's problem to protect content. This just represents the first steps towards a Chinese model of "freedom".
Same game of thrones is good. Not as good as the books but good.
ping
And no state our size can truly stand free speech. The State does not like to be mocked.
these ‘laws’ only effect Americans.
IP is on the internet. people all over the globe copy and infringe daily. patents or copyrights are a joke.
these ‘laws’ effect only 5% of the population on the planet. worthless.
but hey, i’m sure plenty of union ‘workers’ will make plenty of money ‘enforcing’ it
Yet one more reason to use non-US hosting an non-US domain names.
And it is imperative that Congress gets this bill to the POTUS’ desk well before the next election so that lies about our dear leader can be kept under control. /administration spokesflunky
this will kill the us search engins
Who knew that this was such a pressing issue making sure the very weathy didn’t miss a cent of their income. I mean unemployment is near 20% really, gasoline is over $4 but gee Congress has time for the wealthy?
inciting assembly without permits.
FR has been routinely accused of and sued for supposed copyright violations. If this law had been in effect. Well. You probably wouldn’t be reading this now.
Now come on............ Future crime?
What we need around here are some minority report precog balls with various names photoshopped onto them for things like this.
A ball that says free republic on it, one that says rush limbaugh on it, you get the idea.
:-)
With the advent of the tea party movement, the politburo needs to act quick to clamp down before all is lost.
This will land up in fed court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.