Let me ask you a question: Do you think any Democrat, even in Massachusetts, could have pushed through an agenda so radical as to include gay marriage, socialized medicine complete with $50 co-pay taxpayer-funded abortions, homosexualized state government and public schools, and a gun ban? Or was all of that only made possible because of the protection of an “R” by the Governor’s name?
You have a hard time staying on subject. The point is not whether Romney Care is good or bad — I think we all agree it’s bad. The point is not whether a Democrat version would have been even worse. It mostly likely would have been.
There are only two points here of relevance: Cain’s support of Romney over McCain has nothing to do with Cain’s like of Romney Care (which he does not) ...and a state program is simply not the same thing Constitutionally as a federal program.
Now, change the subject again since you can’t touch these two arguments.