Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

You have a hard time staying on subject. The point is not whether Romney Care is good or bad — I think we all agree it’s bad. The point is not whether a Democrat version would have been even worse. It mostly likely would have been.

There are only two points here of relevance: Cain’s support of Romney over McCain has nothing to do with Cain’s like of Romney Care (which he does not) ...and a state program is simply not the same thing Constitutionally as a federal program.

Now, change the subject again since you can’t touch these two arguments.


75 posted on 05/07/2011 12:59:02 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (American Thinker Columnist / Rush ghost contributor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you endorse. How much more on point do you care to be?


77 posted on 05/07/2011 1:24:35 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ('We hold these truths to be self-evident...' Are you still part of that 'we'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson