You have a hard time staying on subject. The point is not whether Romney Care is good or bad — I think we all agree it’s bad. The point is not whether a Democrat version would have been even worse. It mostly likely would have been.
There are only two points here of relevance: Cain’s support of Romney over McCain has nothing to do with Cain’s like of Romney Care (which he does not) ...and a state program is simply not the same thing Constitutionally as a federal program.
Now, change the subject again since you can’t touch these two arguments.
Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you endorse. How much more on point do you care to be?