[Mr. K]

wtf??????

The video on the link shows this

[Never on my watch]

Onions have layers, Ogres have layers.

[mlizzy]

Must be a busy link. I can’t get on.

[klb99]

why oh why oh why am I not surprised???? Everything about this guy is phony.

[navysealdad]

What is the font on the certificate???

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

The original certificate should be released directly from the State of Hawaii, to the SCOTUS for review. That would settle things (or things are far, far worse than they appear).

[TexasCajun]

Server overload.

[camle]

it was made that way specifically to give the birthers something to sieze, so obama can claim that nothing can please them, and further marginalize them. he doesn’t WANT the birthers to accept the document!

[The Magical Mischief Tour]

I called this one... said no matter what Osama produced it wouldn’t bee good enough...

Way to go Freepers, now your really making us all look like a bunch of loons...

[ClearCase_guy]

1) Layers are odd. I've seen some people say that scanning SW can introduce layers, but these layers are still worth investigating.
2) The last digit in the COLB Number is clearly digital. No typewriter used on that character. Hmmmmmm?

These are the most fruitful avenues I've seen.

[5thGenTexan]

This has made it to Drudge Report, too.

[klb99]

Also,,what about the fonts? There were only typewriters in ‘61.......

[Jayster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgVIei87oFo

[BreezyDog]

I got it for ya...I posted it in another thread.

Link

[Blood of Tyrants]

Another forgery? Call Dan Rather, he can spot a forgery in a second.

[Jeff Winston]

1. Demonstrate that the certificate the White House released is NOT what was received from Hawaii.

or,

2. Demonstrate that the certificates the State of Hawaii supplied are themselves forged.

or,

3. Demonstrate that the letter posted from Loretta J Fuddy is a forgery.

Unless you can do one (or more) of the three, and do so in an iron-clad manner, you really don’t have anything (as far as I can tell) that demonstrates the new certificate is a forgery.

The presence of layers in the PDF could well turn out to be relevant to one of the three items above, but unless you can convincingly demonstrate the layers aren’t “innocently” there, that fact alone does not seem sufficient to label the release a forgery.

[sheik yerbouty]

If this is the real deal, where is the longform format with the footprint? Why is the race of the child listed as African? That, in 1961 would be black or negro. Lastly, in 0bama’s book, he said that his name was Barry and to ft with radicals it was changed to Barack.

[Deaf Smith]

bump

[RetSignman]

[BuckeyeTexan]

So let me get this straigt? You’re analyzing an electronic copy of a physical sheet of paper to determine whether or not the physical sheet of paper is a forgery? And that’s logical how?

Obama asked for an obtained TWO certified copies of his long-form BC from the HDoH. One of them was passed around the WH Briefing Room for the reporters to touch, feel, photograph, and photocopy.

All of this nonsense is an embarrassment.

[Ladysforest]

HA! Here is something else it has: http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/04/27/pants-on-the-ground .. . Is it just me or do the date field numbers look almost identical for having been signed by two different women? ESPECIALLY the "61".