Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

As long as he knows he's married and as long as Kate is alright with him, not wanting to wear a wedding ring it's no one's business
1 posted on 04/05/2011 5:44:25 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

They get their knickers in a knot about this.

Meanwhile, Sharia is creeping into the UK.


2 posted on 04/05/2011 5:50:45 AM PDT by PogySailor (The ruling class will not go down easily. And neither will their paid hacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nobody’s business but William and his wife.

I don’t wear one, or a watch, or a necklace, or an ear ring , and my tongue isn’t pierced.

People do not have to adorn themselves with jewelry.


4 posted on 04/05/2011 5:53:01 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The only ring I’m concerned about is the large sapphire that Kate M. wears. It was Diana’s engagement ring and I just think it’s a very unlucky ring. And I don’t believe in good and bad luck - generally. The fact that it wasn’t even put into a new setting also gives me the creeps. That ring did not represent a happy or even very sane marriage.


6 posted on 04/05/2011 6:00:57 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

he is not less married without a ring.

for non-prince williams men, rings are an impediment at work or just plain annoying.

Besides it is more money for jewelry for women.


7 posted on 04/05/2011 6:04:55 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

2 Marriages 2 wedding rings, 1 marriage no ring, guess which one lasted 3x the other two combined? Besides I never was one for jewelery, marriage is more of the heart, not the trinket.


11 posted on 04/05/2011 6:16:22 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (The storm clouds of war are on the horizon, 1939 is again approaching us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
(1) The World War II thing is nonsense: men have been wearing wedding rings since at least the 1000s (certainly earler than that, it was in the 1000s that Church sacramentaries began including a formal blessing specifically for the rings).

(2) Prince William is, in theory, a future head of the Church of England. A wedding ring is part of the Book of Common Prayer ceremony. One may argue that wearing a ring is "his personal choice" - but he considers himself a prince. He is not a purely private individual.

12 posted on 04/05/2011 6:16:40 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I frequently work with power tools, my wife used to get upset becasue I would take my ring off when at work. I showed her some pictures of the results of people getting rings and other jewelry items caught in equipment.

No arguments after that.

13 posted on 04/05/2011 6:40:46 AM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hooligans rule GB

Union thugs rule USA

Muslim Brotherhood ruling the middle east

Anarchists running mobs in every country.

All’s well in Obama’s world


15 posted on 04/05/2011 6:46:06 AM PDT by Carley (UNION AGITATORS, NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ARAB STREET. UGLY AND VIOLENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Wearing a wedding ring is just an old tradition - like having a royal family.

I don’t care what this idiot does. But, tradition is the only thing that keeps his family living in splendor and wealth. One would think the royals would have the good sense to embrace tradition.

Sooner or later, modern-thinking Brits will decide to do away with the expense of the royalty, and the royal family will all cry “But what of our ancient traditions!?”. lol That’ll be a hard sell if they continue to snub English and Western traditions at every turn...


19 posted on 04/05/2011 7:02:54 AM PDT by Fletcher J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What’s the big deal? I’m married and don’t wear a wedding ring. Why? Because I have never worn a ring except for the brief times when I put one on and panicked because I felt my finger quickly swelling up. Maybe it was in my mind but any ring on my finger feels highly uncomfortable.


20 posted on 04/05/2011 7:07:05 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (The Coupon Whisperer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Does it matter? Everyone but the dead on earth will know he’s married!


21 posted on 04/05/2011 7:18:15 AM PDT by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When I see men who work with their hands, I tell them they shouldn’t wear rings at work. The new carbide rings make me shudder, the can’t be cut off with traditional ring cutters.


24 posted on 04/05/2011 7:53:17 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
men are..servants who exist to serve women’s needs and desires

That's me all over, baby.

26 posted on 04/05/2011 7:56:55 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Helen draws a false parallel, IMO. Surely the female version of whether or not to wear a wedding ring is-—whether or not she wears a wedding ring. They can do it both or either as an obligation and obligatory symbol or as a choice and an option. If it’s an option and she wants to but he doesn’t, so be it—but it seems very much to be the couple’s choice.


32 posted on 04/05/2011 8:46:00 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson