We seem to have the bait, just need the luring mechanism.
Posted on 03/04/2011 6:24:16 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike
The case of Hollister v. Soetoro will be distributed for conference on Friday, March 4, at the Supreme Court. As you recall, the judge in this case deemed Hollister’s case frivolous as Obama’s eligibility had been ‘twittered’ and thus resolved. He dismissed the case and then threatened sanctions. What he forgot to do was dismiss the case based on standing, as all the other judges have.
(Excerpt) Read more at drkatesview.wordpress.com ...
I hope that all the harassment direct toward Thomas and his wife by the left will inspire him to stand up and insist on taking the case.
I hope that all the harassment directed toward Thomas and his wife by the left will inspire him to stand up and insist on taking the case.
Wow.
I don’t think this will go anywhere: There’d be too much undoing to be done if the illegal alien were to be found out to be an illegal alien.
For one thing, two people on the Supreme Court would have to be excused from the case since they would have been illegally nominated and confirmed.
Plus, add up all the laws, and everything else done by this skinny interloper since he moved into our White House. There’d be turmoil. And who’d remove him from our White House?
“And who’d remove him from our White House?”
Me and a few of my friends!
The story yesterday about the Georgia congressmen taking their names off the bill to require all on the ballot to prove eligibility was really crious to me. For al these judges, the US Congress and then for them to do that tells me there is something really scary going on.
““And who’d remove him from our White House?”
Me and a few of my friends!”
Yea’butt, how’d you get his charming, overweight wife out of there?
What makes you think that he hasn't been voting to hear these cases all along?
the secret service and all the armed forces
“”The story yesterday about the Georgia congressmen taking their names off the bill””
I must have missed that - what was that about? Don’t see anything in local paper either.
If they can tell Thomas he has to recuse himself from Zerocare consideration because his wife was a lobbyist....
But believe that the Supremes consider ‘fallout’ when deciding cases. A case involving a local woman (Lake Travis, TX) was shot down 5-4 in ‘98 with O’Conner writing the dissent that even though the woman was completely within her
rights, finding for her would cause law enforcement all over the country to un-do tickets, arrests, etc.
We seem to have the bait, just need the luring mechanism.
There already is massive turmoil being being brought on the country by The One. He’s a radical and his supporters are radicals.
Remember how angry the supreme court made white racists when they found in favor of equal rights beyond race? Man, that upset apple carts across the country to it’s core. The same with womens’ rights. All manner of laws and procedures were overturned from the largest to the smallest organization in the US.
The issue of equal rights for foreigners versus what rights apply to only citizens of the US has been a huge problem for our country. This concept has been challenged by the UN and alot of American globalists. They question our right to have borders and citizenship in America. They claim we are an international nation and international property.
So this case has a major impact beyond just Obama and his precious “change” which would be threatened by a finding that he is not eligible for office (he and the DNC and SOS lied). It would put our elite back on notice that in the area of rights bestowed on the citizens of the US and US sovergnity, in the constitution’s original intent still governs this independent Nation.
A determination of National sovergnity and citizenship is the real reason the international Corporations, globalists, Rinos and liberals/socialists see this decision as disrptive of their plans or “progress.” They put a foreigner in the oval office showing Americans that they have no nation and no meaning in citizenship anymore.
” charming, overweight wife “ = COW = Forklift!
I dunno, she might fit in the bucket of a bobcat?
tie a chocolate eclair to her eyebrows............she’ll follow ya anywhere
....it’s how we catch chupicabras
More likely, as has already happened in Kerchner v. Obama and Congress, Roberts, who knows the truth but won't abide his oath to protect the Constitution, won't vote to take the case. The two Obama appointees, Kagan and Sotomayor won't recuse themselves, in spite of their obvious conflict of interest, since an illigitimate Obama will cost them their jobs. It takes four justices to accept a case for hearing. Three would be sufficient if there are only seven justices. But the court has been packed.
And remember, it is purely a Constitutional issue, one which, according the Chief Justice John Marshall, the court must accept. The court is protecting Obama, though they will, if forced by impeachment proceedings, impeachment of justices, which is provided for in the Constitution, claim that they felt they were protecting the republic from the civil disruption removing Obama would cause. Their real reason, at least for Kagan and Sotomayor, is that they, like Obama, don't respect the Constitution, and were appointed to help render it irrelevant.
Chief Justice Morrison Waite in Minor v. Happersett speaks for all those who value the protection of our Constitution:
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At , with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Obama and the media think you won't understand “of parents who were its citizens.” He depends upon your being afraid of being hurt by names - like “Birther.” Obama’s father was never a citizen. The provision was to try to insure that our leader possessed allegiance inherited from his parents. Obama does possess allegiance but his father never believed our republic was a desirable government; Obama is he is true to the dreams from his father, and constitutionally ineligible to be president.
We find out if the Constitution still means anything. If it does, it
(1) could well mark the beginning of a swing away from the use of the "Commerce Clause" as the judicial basis of Federal power over every aspect of our lives.
(2)Lead to an order for discovery on Obama/Soetoro's eligibility and eventually a ruling on Article II Natural Born Citizenship.
Let's see if our judiciary is up to a decent week's work.
I’m expecting another whitewash. Unfortunately, rather than upholding The Constitution, this court won’t touch it with a ten foot pole.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.