Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Humiliates Bumbling and Ignorant Character Assassins at the Far-Left Gawker
Reaganite Republican ^ | November 22, 2010 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 11/22/2010 6:28:42 AM PST by Reaganite Republican

Like shooting fish in a barrel... next!

YET ANOTHER crew of liberal tools out to destroy Palin get the tables turned on them... and to devastating effect:

It seems that there are those people that continue to sneer at Sarah Palin, portraying her as stupid, and worse. Each time this has occurred Palin has proved them wrong. Their lack of success has not deterred them from continuing to try. This incident ends no differently.

As you probably know Mrs. Palin has written a new book called, “America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith and Flag“. It’s scheduled to be released this week. Gawker, a far left muckraker publication, and no stranger to Palin bashing, published leaked excerpts from her book. Mrs. Palin objected to the leaks. She tweeted this: “The publishing world is LEAKING out-of-context excerpts of my book w/out my permission? Isn’t that illegal?”

Gawker’s Maureen O’Connor responded to Mrs. Palin, snidely lecturing her about copyright law:

---------------------------------------------------------

“Did you catch the excerpt we posted yesterday from Sarah Palin’s new book? Sarah did. She tweets with rage: “The publishing world is LEAKING out-of-context excerpts of my book w/out my permission? Isn’t that illegal?”

[Sarah: If you're reading this—and if you are, welcome!—you may want to take a moment to familiarize yourself with the law. Try starting here or here. Or skip the totally boring reading and call one of your lawyers. They'll walk you through it.]

---------------------------------------------------------

Unfortunately for Gawker, they don’t seem to have read their own links. Or perhaps they simply didn’t comprehend them as explained to them, no doubt, by their attorneys.

Harper Collins, Palin’s publisher, promptly asked for and received an injunction against Gawker Media, asking that the site be banned from what it termed “further copyright infringement.” The injunction prohibits Gawker from “continuing to distribute, publish or otherwise transmit pages from the book” pending a hearing on Nov. 30...

Sure would be nice if she chose to press charges and shed some light on the network of media hacks conspiring against her... seems like a golden opportunity.

But sadly, it's not just libs who are out to get Sarah Palin, as most of you know. Bush family matron Barbara and George Will -elements of the old guard GOP that helped in driving the party into the ground- are piping in with their two cents lately. But in who's listening to these spent-force blue blood Republican types in the midst of a epic grassroots conservative revolution anyway?

Best get with the program George Will... you geek lol. If not, just go sit play with your baseball cards and stay out of the way. At this point, even the NYT's Frank Rich is beginning to face reality... Barbara wants Jeb run... what's your excuse then:

It’s anti-elitism that most defines angry populism in this moment, and, as David Frum, another Bush alumnus (and Palin critic), has pointed out, populist rage on the right is aimed at the educated, not the wealthy. The Bushies and Noonans and dwindling retro-moderate Republicans are no less loathed by Palinistas and their Tea Party fellow travelers than is Obama’s Ivy League White House.

When Palin mocks her G.O.P. establishment critics as tortured, paranoid, sleazy and a “good-old-boys club,” she pays no penalty for doing so. The more condescending the attacks on her, the more she thrives. This same dynamic is also working for her daughter Bristol, who week after week has received low scores and patronizing dismissals from the professional judges on “Dancing with the Stars” only to be rescued by populist masses voting at home.

Revealingly, Sarah Palin’s potential rivals for the 2012 nomination have not joined the party establishment in publicly criticizing her. They are afraid of crossing Palin and the 80 percent of the party that admires her. So how do they stop her? Not by feeding their contempt in blind quotes to the press — as a Romney aide did by telling Time’s Mark Halperin she isn’t “a serious human being.” Not by hoping against hope that Murdoch might turn off the media oxygen that feeds both Palin’s viability and News Corporation’s bottom line. Sooner or later Palin’s opponents will instead have to man up — as Palin might say — and actually summon the courage to take her on mano-a-maverick in broad daylight.

Short of that, there’s little reason to believe now that she cannot dance to the top of the Republican ticket when and if she wants to.

_________________________________________________________

Give em hell, 'Cuda...

More at Reaganite Republican


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; gawker; msm; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2010 6:28:48 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

You should hire an editor.


2 posted on 11/22/2010 6:36:37 AM PST by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Very good points, well stated.


3 posted on 11/22/2010 6:38:14 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Rules will never work for radicals (liberals) because they seek chaos. And don't even know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

“populist rage on the right is aimed at the educated, not the wealthy.”

My rage is directed against those who don’t believe in free market solutions and a strong America.


4 posted on 11/22/2010 6:40:26 AM PST by ari-freedom (Obama is now the Groper in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
ineluctable

5 posted on 11/22/2010 6:40:58 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The people who hate Sarah Palin hate her because they know that her Presidency is inevitable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Very good points, well stated.

He should, nonetheless, hire an editor.

6 posted on 11/22/2010 6:41:22 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
My personal recollection only, but...

Sarah Palin, at this point, is right about where Ronald Reagan was in 1978, in terms of his treatment by the the Republican establishment.

In terms of the media, Sarah has maybe twenty times the visibility, at this point, that Ronnie had in 1978.

7 posted on 11/22/2010 6:44:22 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Yeah - the EDUCATED elected someone about whom they knew absolutely nothing. That’s pretty smart, right?
Funny thing is, the same EDUCATED crowd tried to sell themselves as populists until Sarah came along. It must be exhausting being a lib - not knowing what to believe in from one day to the next.


8 posted on 11/22/2010 6:53:12 AM PST by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: earlJam; Mr. Lucky
Are you suggesting that LOL isn't considered professional in writing? I didn't see a WTF or a ROFLMAO but I may have just missed it.

Put me in for a third voice on hiring an editor

9 posted on 11/22/2010 6:58:24 AM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA ("The View" is the new Maury Povich inspired "Fight Club in Heels")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Maureen O’Connor turns out to be pretty stupid.


10 posted on 11/22/2010 6:58:48 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Rules will never work for radicals (liberals) because they seek chaos. And don't even know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

“populist rage on the right is aimed at the educated, not the wealthy.”

More the rag eis directed at those that Pretend to be educated. A degree does not mean you are smart. The elites seem to not understand this point.


11 posted on 11/22/2010 7:01:25 AM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

If “education” means being indoctrinated in a bunch of Keynesian/Commie hooey then we need less of it.


12 posted on 11/22/2010 7:07:46 AM PST by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

“It seems that there are those people that continue to sneer at Sarah Palin, portraying her as stupid, and worse. Each time this has occurred Palin has proved them wrong. Their lack of success has not deterred them from continuing to try. This incident ends no differently.”

This also applies to certain “operatives” that infect FR.

LLS


13 posted on 11/22/2010 7:11:06 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Liberals aren’t the only ones out to destroy her...I heard a clip of Barbara Bush (mother) say she hopes Palin stays in Alaska.


14 posted on 11/22/2010 7:12:42 AM PST by Fawn (CANCER SUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

‘Populist rage directed at the educated, not the wealthy’?

I know he is quoting David Frum, but is he kidding? At the ‘educated’?

What does that mean? A BA, a BS, a community college degree, from what or which institutions? State universities or the ivy-league schools or medical colleges?

Are all the high school drop-outs in the inner cities enraged at the ‘educated’?

And what does an ‘education’ mean at present? Liberal arts, hard sciences, vet schools, degrees in theology?

David Frum is a newspaper-killer.


15 posted on 11/22/2010 7:17:15 AM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
Bush family matron Barbara and George Will - elements of the old guard GOP that helped in driving the party into the ground- are piping in with their two cents lately. But in who's listening to these spent-force blue blood Republican types in the midst of a epic grassroots conservative revolution anyway?

Couldn't have put it better m'self.

16 posted on 11/22/2010 7:34:34 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
I heard that too, and her poll numbers probably went up 10 points :)

Heck even liberals might take a second look at her now... I mean if the Bush's don't like her... she must have some redeeming qualities :P

17 posted on 11/22/2010 8:04:49 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Enrage the Left and wreck ABC’s prime TV asset at the same time: Vote for Bristol tonight on DWTS at 800-868-3407


18 posted on 11/22/2010 9:40:05 AM PST by montag813 (Enrage the Left: Vote for Bristol on DWTS at 800-868-3407)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

I don’t care about Gawker being stopped from posting. I want to see them financially CRIPPLED. Any chance of penalties?


19 posted on 11/22/2010 9:41:41 AM PST by montag813 (Enrage the Left: Vote for Bristol on DWTS at 800-868-3407)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
The people spoke loud and clear in the recent 2010 elections, in spite of massive Democrat and RINO voter fraud. I've had it with these treasonous scumbags. I really hate that I have had to defend the retarded, anti-American GWB in debates against even worse communists.

It is understandable that establishment RINO pukes are crapping their lace panties. F'm all, and may they all suffer a horrible, painful, lingering demise, sufficient in duration and pain such that they have ample time to reflect on their treason against American citizens.

George Will can go suck eggs. Barbara Bush can go suck eggs, along with her husband, sons, and grandkids. I'll actively work against any and every RINO pissant elitist Bush, Romney, et al, that sticks their name forward in future elections, and so will many millions of other Amercans.

And for all you FoxNews bimbos, such as Megyn Kelly: Yes you're cute (that's why Fox hired you), and for a while you appeared to be conservative. Show yourself as a treasonous RINO scumbag, though, and you will be spoken of as such by We The People. Wherever you came from, you can go back there, and stay out of sight and out of mind from the American public.

See? We The People can tactfully tell you folks to get lost, too. We don't need your vote or your voice. So shut up already.

20 posted on 11/22/2010 11:56:53 AM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson