1 posted on
11/04/2010 8:14:33 AM PDT by
connor_in
To: connor_in
2 posted on
11/04/2010 8:16:24 AM PDT by
FrankR
(STOP Obamacare, or we'll vote you outta' here....)
To: connor_in
EASY FIX! Just rename them ‘GAY MEALS’ only a ‘homophobes’ would ban them then!! ;-)
3 posted on
11/04/2010 8:16:49 AM PDT by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: connor_in
What’re they gonna do when they get the munchies?
4 posted on
11/04/2010 8:17:20 AM PDT by
Darkwolf377
( Mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet!Oh, the tears of unfathomable sadness! Mm-yummy! --E. Cartman)
To: connor_in
6 posted on
11/04/2010 8:18:30 AM PDT by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: connor_in
"San Francisco bans Happy Meal" but wanted legal Weed and likes legal abortion.
Don't forget the illegals - SF is a "sanctuary" city.
Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
7 posted on
11/04/2010 8:19:05 AM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: connor_in
is this not a bill of attainder?
8 posted on
11/04/2010 8:19:12 AM PDT by
melkor
To: connor_in
They are anti-breeder in San Fransicko. But if you are going to have kids, they cannot be happy. The BLT community has a trademark on the word gay these days.
10 posted on
11/04/2010 8:25:30 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: connor_in
To: connor_in
So what is a pot supposed to eat when they get the munchies?
13 posted on
11/04/2010 8:27:07 AM PDT by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: connor_in
In liberal land everything that is right is wrong and everything that is wrong is right.
To: connor_in
McDonald's should offer assistance for franchise holders to leave San Francisco.
This is nanny state crap run amok. Making it illegal to give a child a toy erects a barrier to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
That's why it's called a “happy” meal.
FUSF
18 posted on
11/04/2010 8:36:25 AM PDT by
Gabrial
(The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
To: connor_in
They want to ban the things that ordinary people like and legalize the things that liberal elitists like.
19 posted on
11/04/2010 8:38:03 AM PDT by
ari-freedom
(Ding dong the Pelosi is gone!)
To: connor_in
I believe San Fran also has free drug needle programs,too.
It’s Bizzaro world there.
23 posted on
11/04/2010 8:44:39 AM PDT by
WOBBLY BOB
( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
To: connor_in
I remember when San Francisco banned fast-food chains. The City protected the many restaurants and their union waitresses. They banned McDonald’s and others until the early 1970s.
25 posted on
11/04/2010 8:47:56 AM PDT by
namvolunteer
(I can see November from my house.)
To: connor_in
“My Body, My Choice” only applies when you are killing that unwanted ‘growth’. And for the “kids can’t choose, so we must protect them” folks, the unborn baby isn’t choosing, either.
To: connor_in
I see this as a giant size plus. Any law that may keep innocent kids safe and out of that amoral,disease ridden city is ok in my book
27 posted on
11/04/2010 8:52:54 AM PDT by
Cyman
To: connor_in
And bathhouses.
They’ve got to have their bathhouses.
28 posted on
11/04/2010 8:55:41 AM PDT by
Califreak
(November 2008 proved that Idiocracy isn't just a movie anymore)
To: connor_in
I’m guessing that the San Francisco Board of Overlords would be fine with McDonald’s replacing the toy with a HamBurgler Condom.
30 posted on
11/04/2010 9:25:49 AM PDT by
CygnusTheSwan
("Me fail English? That's unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
