Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov’t Now Pays 30 Cents Of Every $1 in Income
IBD's Capital Hill ^ | 9/1/2010 | Jed Graham

Posted on 09/01/2010 2:28:25 PM PDT by Slyscribe

By at least one measure, government is playing an unprecedented role in the economy: In recent months, more than 30 cents of every dollar in personal income came directly from the government, new Commerce Department data show.

That’s equal to about $3.8 trillion of $12.5 trillion in total personal income on an annualized basis.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.investors.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: broke; debt; deficit; government; income; publicemployees; transferpayments; unions

1 posted on 09/01/2010 2:28:29 PM PDT by Slyscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
Government doesn't pay for shit! They rob from producers and mostly give it to nonproducers, period!
2 posted on 09/01/2010 2:31:07 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

” more than 30 cents of every dollar in personal income came directly from the government, “

Where does one start, when explaining to someone this ignorant, that there is no such thing as “Government Money”.....


3 posted on 09/01/2010 2:31:51 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
Although government spending is on an unsustainable path, the surge in spending has helped to offset weakness in the private economy.

I love IBD but how did the editors let this whopper slip through??

4 posted on 09/01/2010 2:35:59 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

go post on the site....I did.....these idiots need to be called out!


5 posted on 09/01/2010 2:36:05 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Profitmaking is a VIRTUE, not a Vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
"there is no such thing as “Government Money"

Then how can they afford all that government cheese?

6 posted on 09/01/2010 2:36:33 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (These fragments I have shored against my ruins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

...but it’s “deficit neutral”.


7 posted on 09/01/2010 2:36:50 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

WHERE THE HELL IS MY PONY?


8 posted on 09/01/2010 2:37:19 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Political correctness in America today is a Rip Van Winkle acid trip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

” Then how can they afford all that government cheese? “

The Cheese-Fairy-Czar delivers it every Wednesday from Obama’s Stash....


9 posted on 09/01/2010 2:38:40 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
"Where does one start, when explaining to someone this ignorant, that there is no such thing as “Government Money”..... "

One could start by being less paranoiac. We say that an employer, a corporation pays a salary. Where does it get the money? Well, it's shareholders' money, of course. We merely mention from which hands the paycheck is obtained.

Likewise in the article. It makes the point that 30% of income is received via paychecks from the government. That's all, and that's correct. Where the government gets the money, just as in the case of the preceding example of a corporation, is another question, which is unrelated to the article.

10 posted on 09/01/2010 2:39:32 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

That’s nothing - Stalin paid for one hundred percent, which is manifestly where Obama would like to take us.


11 posted on 09/01/2010 2:39:59 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
Guess so, according to them. But if someone can explain to me how you can take substance (money earned) out of an economy, and then turn around and disburse it (less a fantastic rakeoff for government waste/corruption/fraud/greed/victim pandering) and improve the economy over what it was before, then I'd sure as hell like to hear it.

Government adds no value, and its original Founding Father-given mandate to see to very limited areas has been bastardized beyond recognition.

12 posted on 09/01/2010 2:43:28 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

” We say that an employer, a corporation pays a salary. Where does it get the money? Well, it’s shareholders’ money, of course. “

In the Capitalism I was raised in, salaries come from the proceeds from the sale of goods and/or services....

Only “Dot-Com-Bubble” companies survived solely on “shareholders’ money”, and then quietly went away when that ran out....


13 posted on 09/01/2010 2:45:22 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
WHERE THE HELL IS MY PONY?

He was delicious. Thanks.

14 posted on 09/01/2010 2:45:52 PM PDT by gundog (Why is it that useful idiots remain idiots long after they've exhausted their usefulness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
busy as Pony Czar in the Dog and Pony show


15 posted on 09/01/2010 2:54:58 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
"In the Capitalism I was raised in, salaries come from the proceeds from the sale of goods and/or services...."

This is factually incorrect.

Legally, all of the revenues are property of the shareholders. Once goods/services are sold, those revenues, whether or not realized, belong to the owners. Liabilities, including payroll, are paid out of the entire pot of shareholders' equity: some or all of it may be revenues, but that is unimportant. This is reflected not only in law but even in accounting. It is false to say that expenses are paid out of revenues: both revenues and expenses are cleared simultaneously into the profit/loss account, which is then cleared into owners' equity.

What you expressed in nothing but hope of the owners, namelt, that their equity will increase, which occurs when expenses, including the payroll, do not exceed the revenues.

16 posted on 09/01/2010 6:21:02 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson