Posted on 07/22/2010 4:13:50 PM PDT by rxsid
"The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Finds Attorney Apuzzo Not Liable for Obama's/Congress’ Damages and Costs Incurred by Them in Defending the Kerchner Appeal
On July 2, 2010, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision affirming the New Jersey Federal District Court’s dismissal of the Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al case for lack of Article III standing. The Court ordered that I show cause in 14 days why the Court should not find me liable for just damages and costs suffered by the defendants, not in having to defend against the merits of plaintiffs’ underlying claims that Putative President Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen,” that he has yet to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii, that Congress failed to exercise its constitutional duty to properly vet and investigate Obama’s “natural born Citizen” status, and that former Vice President and President of the Senate, Dick Cheney, and current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, were complicit in that Congressional failure, but rather in having to defendant against what the court considers to be a frivolous appeal of the District Court’s dismissal of their claims on the ground of Article III standing. On Monday, July 19, 2010, I filed my response. This afternoon, on July 22, 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision on whether it should impose the damages and costs upon me. The Court has decided not to impose any damages and costs upon me and has discharged its order to show cause. This means that the matter of damages and costs is closed. Here is the Court’s decision:
"ORDER (SLOVITER, BARRY and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges) On July 2, 2010, this Court filed an Order to Show Cause directing Appellants’ counsel to show cause in writing why he should not be subject to an Order pursuant to F.R.A.P. 38 for pursuing a frivolous appeal. In response, Mario Apuzzo filed a 95-page statement that contains, inter alia, numerous statements directed to the merits of this Court’s opinion, which the Court finds unpersuasive. His request that the Court reconsider its opinion is denied, as the appropriate procedure for that issue is through a Petition for Rehearing. However, based on Mr. Apuzzo's explanation of his efforts to research the applicable law on standing, we hereby discharge the Order to Show Cause, filed. Sloviter, Authoring Judge. (PDB)."
I want to thank everyone who supported and encouraged me in this battle. This includes everyone who expressed their feelings on this matter through blog posts, articles, and comments, and emails.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
July 22, 2010"
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/third-circuit-court-of-appeals-finds.html
BUMP
SCOTUS????
SCOTUS????
-----------------------------------------------------------
He/she wanted Apuzzo sanctioned so this is bad news to him and his ilk.
bttt
Which site has the original filings.
Plaintiff, defendants etc listed.
Excellent!!
Awesome! This is great news. Is the next step the Supremes?
Thanks for the ping!
Great news!
I will continue to pray!
Yes, the next step is the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS). Keep reading Attorney Apuzzo’s blog at: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
And if you can, help the cause for that and other steps at: http://www.protectourliberty.org
Yes
Nice to meet you, sir.
From the site: “Want to do something but don’t have the money to make a donation?
Write a Letter to the Editor of your local or regional newspaper
decrying the lack of coverage and the cover-up of the Obama eligibility issue
and the outragious court decisions being handed down to silence We the People.”
This is something we ALL can do to help.
Godspeed.
WooHoo! This has made my night.
They’re not here since there is nothing they can twist or sneer at. No Orly, no Globe, no baby footprints.
Just some bad news for their master.
Bullseye! I knew that they would not try to collect fees imposed by obambi’s team... That would give Mario standing in court.
This is not good news!
This ‘troll’ has spent the last half hour reading about S&W’s 8 shot 357s. Clicked on FR, and this thread was at the top of the list. Frightening, isn’t it? I suspect there is a psyops unit in DC - maybe in the WH basement - that adjusts the listing of FR to ensure a thread like this is on top when I hit “FR Posts” on my browser.
Aside from that...not exactly a huge win for birthers. I doubt either Congress or the WH has any problem raising the cash from TAXPAYERS to defend themselves. Meanwhile, it gave the Court another chance to laugh at birthers.
Now, as y’all say, on to the SCOTUS! Charge!
And when the SCOTUS blows you yet another raspberry, you can embroider Judge Thomas’s joke on a blanket and wrap it around yourself as you curl into a fetus position.
Let’s see - the Court laughs at you, and you shout “Yippee!” Whatever, dudes...
Have you seen our Vattel thread?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2512143/posts?q=1&;page=101
I wonder, maybe lawyers should stop opposing the damages/sanctions...
Then immediately request discovery. But their luck, the court would break their own law, and not allow the discovery and they would be stuck with the damages.
You can’t play with people who don’t play fair. Judges do whatever they want, there is virtually no recourse.
This is kind of like admitting the case has merit without formally admitting the case has merit. If it truly had no merit, seems like the Court would have issued an order to make Apuzzo cover the courts costs for the defendant. Hmmmmm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.