Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Term For “Bright” Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=2454 ^ | William M. Briggs

Posted on 06/01/2010 4:17:01 AM PDT by mattstat

What is a “bright”? It is not, as is by now well known to contemporary thinkers, the opposite of a “dim”, a “dark”, or a “slavish, easily led idiot.”

No. A “bright” is a “is a person who has a naturalistic worldview [one which] is free of supernatural and mystical elements.” Further, the “ethics and actions of a bright are based on a naturalistic worldview.”

In plain words: an “atheist,” a label brights reject, for the same reason some feminists despise the term “history”—their enemies form part of the words.

When this merry band of illuminators, these light-bringers to the world first formed, many objected to their appellation, finding it insulting, demeaning, and just too damn cocksure. I cannot agree with these complaints.

Words are not static, their definitions shift with time, mood, culture. Any fully educated person should be able to track the subtle shifts in meanings of simple words. So when brights tell us that they are not to be thought of as “smart-asses who rub their self-awarded superiority in our faces”, it is our duty, not theirs, to understand exactly what they do mean.

But if anything, the relabeling efforts of the brights to distinguish their uniqueness does not go far enough. For one, there is no shade of science in “bright”, a connotation I am anxious to restore. I believe I have found a way.

Now, everybody knows what an “ass” is: an obstinate, stubborn but strong, high-endurance animal. Well, how about let’s define a “hole” as an impenetrable abyss, a place of secrets just waiting to be illuminated by a “bright.”

If we were to concatenate these two words together, we’d have a new creature which is generously defined as “a stubborn seeker, a stalwart investigator, an uncoverer of knowledge.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wmbriggs.com ...


TOPICS: Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: atheism; bright; dawkins; dennett

1 posted on 06/01/2010 4:17:01 AM PDT by mattstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mattstat
bright is a lot like cool, if you have to tell people you are, you aren't...
2 posted on 06/01/2010 4:56:59 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattstat
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations?" - Isaiah 14

Should we tell them that Lucifer means light-bearer, very similar to "brights". It looks like they've accidentally taken another name with theological significance. Perhaps these atheist activists would prefer a more neutral name, like "dims".

3 posted on 06/01/2010 5:03:34 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattstat

4 posted on 06/01/2010 5:38:51 AM PDT by daletoons (If you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson