Posted on 05/10/2010 4:24:18 AM PDT by Scanian
There is no limit to the depravity of the cultists who worship at the altar of multiculturalism.
100 to 140 million girls and women around the world have been subjected to genital mutilation. And now, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is embracing this barbaric expression of misogyny in the name of cultural sensitivity and immigrant outreach.
Equality Now is stunned by a new policy statement issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which essentially promotes female genital mutilation (FGM) and advocates for federal and state laws [to] enable pediatricians to reach out to families by offering a ritual nick, such as pricking or minor incisions of girls clitorises.
Surely pediatricians sworn to do no harm wouldnt advocate a medically unnecessary practice rooted firmly in hatred of women. Equality Now must have misread the AAPs statement on FGM, right?
Wrong. According to the AAP:
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
They already accept abortion. Why not this?
Is it any wonder that normal people do not take the American Academy of Pediatrics seriously?
What is worse, having it nicked by a highly trained doctor in a sterile environment or having the whole thing cut off by some shaman in the back of a “Temple/Church/Storefront?”
If you wish to disallow the cosmetic nick, then does that mean you want to ban male circumcision?
So, really, you had better shut your mouth ASAP because you reveal too much about yourself on this forum. (Some of us call people like you, TROLLS.)
ALL women should be enraged by this.
Where is the statement by NOW?
...or the AMA for that matter.
Celebrating diversity and wondering which of their chosen ones gets to be Czar of Female Genital Mutilation in some new federal bureaucracy created to perform oversight.
Which of course doesn’t address my central point.
Imagine if there’s a Christian Sect in America who believes in cutting off the head of the penis. The whole knob. And they believe the only way to do it is with a rusty hacksaw. And they’ve been doing it for a hundred years. There’s high rates of child-mortality and serious infection. Should hospitals offer the parents a ritual circumcision in order to reduce the harm?
Agree maybe it doesn’t fall into the cultural sensitivity list.
...and to think that some people take their kids to these psychos.
But there isn't.(Nice attempt at a strawman though)
There is however a "religion" that mutilates the women enslaved by it for no good purpose whatsoever.
Should we enable them to continue doing this or should we fix the problem and outlaw it entirely? Rather than enabling the attack why don't we track down and execute the attackers and solve the issue once and for all?
Enabling has cost us millions and millions dead to abortion already. Haven't we learned our lesson that some behaviors are just not tolerable?
United States
Federal law prohibiting FGC was enacted in 1996. 17 states enacted similar laws between 1994 and 2006.[99]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_cutting
Circumcision is God-given - FGM is not. Oh wait...most don’t believe God anymore. Nevermind.
Hmmm...sounds special!
American Academy of Pediatrics is a leftist group who believe that children are state property. The same group which encourages doctors to ask intrusive questions about religious beliefs, homeschooling, and guns in the home (Only for Christians, mind you).
One should be careful who they choose as a pediatrician, as many, especially younger, pediatricians have the same mindset.
It’s go along to get along, all the way to Hell!
Going Dhimmi.
Can’t have women who might actually enjoy sex, gotta nip it in the bud
One of the reasons Given for Male circumcision is to deprive
enjoyment of sexual relations.
barbra ann
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.