Posted on 09/17/2009 8:32:27 PM PDT by pillut48
Print Headline: "Patriots or Pinheads? Tea Party movement must contain its extremes"
... For its critics, the tea party was a rabble-rousing mob of right-wing hotheads and religious nuts who lack the education to know the difference between a communist and a Nazi but who are sure that our black president is both.
The truth is surely closer to what Byron York of The Washington Examiner said he saw a wide variety of people espousing different points of view, united in their fear of the future and bedrock belief that Washington is not to be trusted.
(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


Dick Armey spoke, but he is not an organizer! We organize only to the extent that we communicate and cooperate, no one is giving orders, and no external funds are being used.
Dick Armey spoke, but he is not an organizer! We organize only to the extent that we communicate and cooperate, no one is giving orders, and no external funds are being used.


Communism is NOT antifascist. The Communists protested AGAINST the US going to war against Nazi Germany until Hitler betrayed their beloved Joseph Stalin, butcher of millions.
Ping to use later ...
The radical fringes I know about are inside the Whitehouse.
This juvenile lib-tard crap got printed in the newspaper? This wouldn’t pass for middle school journalism. FAIL.
LOL. I was there. A million and a half of pretty much nothing but the "great middle". IMO, that was part of what was so uplifting and inspiring, this was middle America awakened.
Great work, and also to the poster of the pictures below from the anti-Bush rallies. I was there with the wife and there was no signage whatwover that was not true and none like the ones against Bush that were so common among those now doing the race calling and protesting. Even more obnoxous lying was that of the peanut farmer, he who used to praise Lester Maddox. The urinalists are getting all clogged up with an overflow of crap.
Guy holding orange sign:
Misspelled some of the words on his sign, but hey, at least he got the one on his t-shirt EXACTLY RIGHT!
Amazing to see, from the Dallas Morning Spews
I consider them a liberal rag L0L
Typical DMN BS.
They chat you up for a while and then give you a black eye.
The Dallas Morning News is one of THE most liberal leaning rags in the US. I only take the weekend editions for the obits, crosswords and TV schedule for the next week. Everything else they waste paper and ink on is just BS.
Yup, and they were so proud of it, the author put his/her name on it and saved it for their resume—NOT!!
My elderly FIL, visiting from India, has a daily routine-drink coffee, read newspaper front to back, eat an orange or a banana. Every day.
As soon as my in-laws go home, the subscription ENDS. (Again. We were long time subscribers years ago until our blood pressure couldn’t take it any more.)
Bump for later reading
I have often stayed with relatives in Dallas and they used to have a subscription to this toilet paper. The Dallas Morning News is one of the goofier Democrat publications, no doubt about it, and that’s coming from somebody who sees Philadelphia Inquirer headlines in local stores on a daily basis!
How is the Dallas Morning News doing these days?
Dying like the rest of the Democrat newspapers, I hope?
When I married my husband in 1994, the paper was larger in size (physically) and thickness. It cost $.25.
We went to India in ‘95 and when we returned a month later the paper’s physical size was smaller, as was thickness, and the price was $.50. We were outraged.
We lived in CA from ‘01 to ‘03. When we returned we found the paper had gotten even MORE liberal leaning and tended to attack Bush, so we didn’t get a subscription. About that time I discovered LGF and FR and Drudge and started getting ALL my news from those sources. The paper was still .50 cents at that time.
Around 2007, I went to a restaurant for breakfast on my own and noticed a paper machine out front and thought I would read a paper while I ate breakfast...the cost? .75 cents!! OUTRAGEOUS!!! I didn’t purchase one, and when I went in the restaurant had several set out for customers to read. Seriously, even with several sections, it was not even half an inch thick!! And I found several stories that were not even subtly leaning left, but out and out liberal remarks. That did it for me!
Earlier this summer I happened to pass a paper machine and glanced at the headlines, then I noticed the cost—$1.00 for a DAILY paper!!! Ack!
You know, they say, oh, newsprint costs more, yada yada, but I believe that they’ve got such a small circulation now they can’t afford to print the paper without charging their readers more for it to stay afloat...I predict by the time my 8 y/o is in high school in a few years, the simply won’t be any hardcopies of the DMN anymore—they’ll have gone the way of the media dinosaurs, LOL!! :-)
That’s what they get for charging more than 2 dollars for a Sunday paper that’s half an inch thick and 90% advertisements!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.