Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Do conservatives need to break away from the Republican [and Democrat] party?
A Daily Poll ^ | July 8, 2009 | Dave Miller (tenger)

Posted on 07/07/2009 9:04:20 PM PDT by tenger

Do conservatives need to break away from the Republican [and Democrat] party? A Daily Poll.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: conservative; democrat; independent; republican

1 posted on 07/07/2009 9:04:21 PM PDT by tenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tenger
Not this 3rd party crap again!


2 posted on 07/07/2009 9:15:21 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tenger

Perhaps I miss the intent, meaning of your request. I don’t understand the word “Conservative” in the same text with the word “Democrat”.


3 posted on 07/07/2009 9:17:34 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

come now, there are conservatives in the Democratic party. What do they call them, Blue dogs or something? they exist and I think they’re fed up with the ways of their liberal friends.


4 posted on 07/07/2009 9:22:11 PM PDT by tenger (If we don't stay on them, they'll get it wrong...Joe Soucheray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Many Tea Parties involve Democrats, Libertarians, Republicans, and Independents. Not only do these Tea Parties indicate discontent with the Government, they indicate that there is/are significant discontent against Dems and Repub status quo practices and policies. Hence why recent polling indicated that more and more people are identifying themselves as Independents when they once called themselves Dems and/or Repubs.

With Barry’s continuing policies to wreck this country and with the continued lack of ANY viable Repub alternative, the time is right for a 3rd party to emerge.


5 posted on 07/07/2009 9:29:27 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tenger

Conservative Democrats are far different from Conservatives I would believe.

Let’s just say that a Conservative Democrat can be mistaken as sane while a Democrat is a positive I.D.


6 posted on 07/07/2009 9:29:35 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tenger

With Conservative Republican Gov. Palin, I will stay
with the party and the person who has the best chance to beat Obama, Gov. Palin.

Third Party loons don’t want Conservative leadership or a Conservative President, the reason for trying to divide the Republican Party


7 posted on 07/07/2009 9:30:07 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tenger

Wow...I’m kinda surprised to see 79% of the voters saying YES. I ‘m happy to see that.


8 posted on 07/07/2009 9:31:21 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tenger

Stop the ridiculous practice of “open primaries”.

Come up with a compromise agreement for term limits.

Restore the rights to the individual States that have been illegally stolen by the Federal government.

Do all of that, and we shouldn’t need a third party.

But the Republican leadership has got to stop it’s pandering to the left, and standing by while the Democrats play by a different set of rules.

Grow some balls or get out of the way!


9 posted on 07/07/2009 9:35:00 PM PDT by airborne (Congratulations to the Stanley Cup Champions! PITTSBURGH PENGUINS RULE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Here is a MUCH better choice:


10 posted on 07/07/2009 9:37:29 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

I would say YES but it doesn’t mean 3rd party - I think that we need true conservative leaders and a grassroots movement - the tea parties have been wonderful thus far and I think there is more to come... who knows there may be someone on the horizon to really start a conservative revolution ;) At that point the RINOs can either get on the conservative train or get run over!


11 posted on 07/07/2009 9:41:16 PM PDT by Lilpug15 (The Forgotten Man: He works, he votes and he generally prays - but He Always Pays": Sumner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Third parties don’t work, never have. Its the fastest way to elect Democrats.


12 posted on 07/07/2009 9:46:03 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

Exactly.


13 posted on 07/07/2009 9:46:47 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

Baldwin is an anti war, 9/11 Truther POS


14 posted on 07/07/2009 9:48:09 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lilpug15

We’ve got a leader and she is making her move. We don’t need a freaking Ross Perot party.


15 posted on 07/07/2009 9:48:57 PM PDT by norge (The amiable dunce is back wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

3rd parties have not worked because they failed to produce a strong and viable enough candidate(s) not necessarily because of their policies, etc.


16 posted on 07/07/2009 9:49:06 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

ping


17 posted on 07/07/2009 9:49:10 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Ridiculous. Teddy Roosevelt was a strong and viable a candidate as you’ll ever find. If it didn’t work for him, it isn’t going to work for some delusional nitwit.


18 posted on 07/07/2009 9:51:51 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tenger

Republicans need to break free from liberals. Democrats need to break free from totalitarian Stalinists.


19 posted on 07/07/2009 9:52:25 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

It never stops. Now serious people ask “Who wants to weaken the only alternative to the Democrat party? And why?”


20 posted on 07/07/2009 9:55:09 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

The DU haw been given their marching orders to
crank up the third party loons on FR.

They can’t hack it that Gov. Palin has great support especially on FR, so it is the old divide the Republicans
so Obama wins again


21 posted on 07/07/2009 9:55:38 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Right, and if a “Teddy Roosevelt” ran in 2012?

Times then are different from the times today, and despite your legitimate doubts to the contrary, given the growing discontent among voters towards Dems and Repubs, as illustrated in recent pollings that indicated that people/voters are increasingly shifting more and more to identifying themselves as Independents rather than Dems and Repubs, I would argue that people/voters are grwoing increasingly open to the notion of a 3rd party given an acceptable alternative or candidate(s).


22 posted on 07/07/2009 10:01:36 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Have you considered the Republican Party circa 1860?


23 posted on 07/07/2009 10:01:57 PM PDT by Controlling Legal Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cranked

What voters? There’s only one political spectrum...so you either carve voters out of the left or the right. Whichever side you carve more out of loses. If you think you can take the middle, go ahead, but to what end? You’ll simply get a smaller version of what you have now.


24 posted on 07/07/2009 10:07:24 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: norge

Oh, I know - and I’m excited! :) ditto on the 3rd Party stuff


25 posted on 07/07/2009 10:07:56 PM PDT by Lilpug15 (The Forgotten Man: He works, he votes and he generally prays - but He Always Pays": Sumner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Why don’t you just vote for Obama as that is the outcome of third parties dividing Republicans.

24/7 Liberal News
Vast majority who grad from highschool and Univ.
are Liberal
Union workers, majority liberal.

Third parties are lucky to get 2%

Just enough to swing an election to Obama


26 posted on 07/07/2009 10:09:21 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Controlling Legal Authority

Yes, it emerged within the context of a far more multipolar system - Federalists, Democratic-Republicans, Whigs, Democrats, Know-Nothings, Constitutional Unionists, etc, etc. In the modern era, since the establishment of the two major political parties, each rought corresponding to one side of the political spectrum, no 3rd party has amounted to anything.


27 posted on 07/07/2009 10:16:53 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Third parties on the right or left are doomed, but one in the center is possible. RINOs and DINOs together might win. The GOP would then be a pure conservative party.


28 posted on 07/07/2009 10:19:03 PM PDT by drubyfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drubyfive

and pigs would fly if they had wings.


29 posted on 07/07/2009 10:24:05 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
"In the modern era, since the establishment of the two major political parties, each rought corresponding to one side of the political spectrum, no 3rd party has amounted to anything."

I wonder why that is./s


30 posted on 07/07/2009 10:44:32 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Under my scenario, where the RINOs voluntarily leave, the trick will be getting them to do it. Putting in Sarah as the leader might one way.


31 posted on 07/07/2009 11:22:13 PM PDT by drubyfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tenger

Tactically it would be a dumb thing, since it would cost conservatives in districts, unless used sparingly and locally/regionally at first.

2ndly I think the best course of action for Conservatives would be to 1) Win Republican Primaries wherever they can, 2) Where there are overwhelming Democratic Party Reg (with no chance of R win, then Run as Independent Conservatives and 3) Where possible run in the Democratic Party as well, hopefully win a few..isn’t the goal here in politics in government to move the country in a more “right” direction no matter which party we use, anyway..


32 posted on 07/07/2009 11:42:03 PM PDT by JSDude1 (DHS, FBI, FEMA, etc have been bad little boys. They need to be spanked and sent to timeout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked

A bigger problem for third party candidacies is the monopolistic control of ballot access created by Repulicans and Democrats. These two parties have passed laws demanding higher filing fees, and huge petitioning requirements that ensure third parties will expend time and resources just to get on the ballot. Time and resources that could be better spent campaigning.


33 posted on 07/08/2009 2:20:53 AM PDT by SkiKnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tenger

Conservatives have been Persona Non Grata in the Republican Party for awhile so they might as well leave


34 posted on 07/08/2009 3:37:21 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
americanophile wrote:Third parties don’t work, never have. Its the fastest way to elect Democrats.

Unless you are Green/Nader who was accused (rightly or wrongly) of spoiling the chances of Gore and Kerry and giving the GOP the win.

Still, the environment is vastly different and the GOP has repeatedly proven itself impotent and ineffective. Do you need more evidence than Obama and a majority Dem congress?

I doubt a new party could do much worse and the time could not be riper. I say strike while the iron is red-hot!
35 posted on 07/08/2009 5:40:46 AM PDT by jaydee770 (What can not be remedied must be endured)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

You are so right that the 3rd Party types are not there to grow a party except to split the GOP. When they run someone for Senate like in MN, it gave us Franken because they take votes away from the GOP candidate every time.

People got suckered by Perot and should remember it gave us 8 years of Clinton.

If they spent the time trying to change the GOP from within instead of splitting it, we would all be better off which makes me wonder about all the 3rd party talk on here — what is the motive. We know we have Dem trolls. It is so obvious most of the time.


36 posted on 07/08/2009 7:22:01 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 ! Sarah for President 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tenger
Already happening.


37 posted on 07/08/2009 7:28:46 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Sarah Palin: Sun Tzu of Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tenger

I will vote for non-statist candidates that make restoring the Constitution a top priority. If those candidates are not Republican, that’s fine.


38 posted on 07/08/2009 7:30:14 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydee770
I doubt a new party could do much worse and the time could not be riper. I say strike while the iron is red-hot!

Change you can believe in? The only thing a new 3rd party will do is split the right and ensure Democrat victories, you can take it to the bank.

39 posted on 07/08/2009 9:50:15 AM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Change you can believe in? The only thing a new 3rd party will do is split the right and ensure Democrat victories, you can take it to the bank.

It is entirely possible that a new party will not succeed the first time out and it will definitely split the vote with the GOP. But like I said, it can not *possibly* produce worse results than the GOP has given us (Obama and a majority dem congress). Folks who think that somehow they can magically reform the GOP are delusional. That monstrosity has decades of deeply entrenched in-breeding that couldn't be dislodged with a train load of TNT. So, if you are a big fan of the GOP's McCain/Specter/Snowe/etc track record, then best of luck to you. I don't wish you ill will, but I don't hold much hope for you either.
40 posted on 07/08/2009 8:42:59 PM PDT by jaydee770 (What can not be remedied must be endured)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jaydee770
"I don't wish you ill will, but I don't hold much hope for you either."

Ditto.

41 posted on 07/08/2009 9:17:08 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
I think before you lecture us here at Free Republic you might want do something constructive about California
42 posted on 07/08/2009 9:42:19 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Not everyone is into the media driven drama of Calif.
Most of the cars I see daily in my city are from East coast, midwest, south, North, and loads daily from your state.

Probably the main problem is the Federal mandate to take care of illegals which we have a huge numbers of, costing California taxpayers billions a year in social services and criminal system.


43 posted on 07/08/2009 9:58:56 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson