Posted on 04/27/2009 6:03:28 PM PDT by Scanian
From error to error one discovers the entire truth. Sigmund Freud.
The Issue The US Congress is currently discussing the Obama climate change strategy and Cap and Trade. One part of the plan says, Implement an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.
The term greenhouse gas emissions is either deliberately misleading or indicates complete ignorance of the science, or both. What they really mean is CO2, yet it is less than 4% of greenhouse gases and the human portion a fraction of that. Why do they want it reduced? It is not a pollutant and not causing global warming or climate change. Reducing it is completely unnecessary and harmful for the plants and will cost trillions. They propose energy alternatives that are potentially more dangerous because they dont work and can replace only a fraction of existing energy sources. This pattern of identifying the wrong agent of change, blaming humans, and proposing inadequate replacements at great cost is not new. We saw very similar events and sequences with claims that Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) was destroying the ozone layer.
The Pattern Many cite the Montreal Protocol as a template for dealing with global warming because it supposedly resolved the ozone crisis. It didnt! Its a template not because it worked but because it was completely unnecessary, cost a lot of money and created other problems. It is also a template for understanding the deception that human CO2 is causing global warming. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) were blamed for atmospheric ozone destruction without evidence and natural processes were ignored.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.