Posted on 04/06/2009 7:20:39 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
Sometimes you just have to laugh at the Pauline Kael-like left. It seems that leftists in America are either mentally stunted or living in such an enclosed, bubble-world that they cannot discern reality from their own fantasy. Such is the case with the faux shock expressed by one Chuck Blow (presumably his real name) from The New York Times whose latest article is filled with the horror that some on the American right might not wish much success for a president of the United States. One must laugh at this man's alarm and wonder if he missed the last eight years where Bush, Cheney -- and at the end, even today, Palin -- were hung in effigy, where the past president was wished a long and torturous death, and where the left wanted untold horrors visited upon them and all Americans that support Republicans?
Charles' sudden awakening to the passion that politics brings is amusing if only to the extent that it is so empty of any introspection. It is hilarious that Chuck only just now had his eyes opened to enflamed political rhetoric and talk of the grave concerns for this country by many millions of his fellow Americans. Sad, in the end, that this guy thinks such vitriol has only just now come from the American right as if born fully grown and never-before-seen.
Chuck must surely have been in a coma since the year 1999.
Read the rest at Publiusforum.com...
To quote the ^greatest^ thing ever said by John MacEnroe, “You CANNOT be serious!?!”
I Dunno...That Roland dude on CNN can give him a run for 'parochialness'
Flashback: 2006 Poll Showed Most Democrats Wanted Bush to Fail
Typical liberal. Always launch personal attacks but never question the merits of the argument.
Calls for criticism of the administration to be termed ‘treason’ will complete the circle. Lots of hypocrisy to go around, which is immediately apparent to those with disdain for all recent administrations. Bootlick is never cool.
I suspect he was not born with that last name but that it was given to him for performing certain deeds.
There is no difference between the NYT and any product advertizing pamphlet.
Why conservatives continue to hand wring over the “bias” red herring is beyond me.
Hint: An advertizing firm’s business is biased toward it’s clientel. No kidding.
Is Chuck Blow any relation to Heywood Jablowmy?
Did he also miss the ACORN leader qouted saying, “We don’t want a war, that comes AFTER we get an army.”
Gives new meaning to Obama’s National Security Force, aka Gestopo.
What, the New York Times hates dark people now? I guess all that diversity stuff was a lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.