Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's age appropriate sex ed for kindergartners? (Obama the liar again, by IL activist)
IllinoisReview.com ^ | Sept. 16, 2008 | Fran Eaton

Posted on 09/22/2008 12:54:55 PM PDT by unspun

What's age appropriate sex ed for kindergartners?

The Obama camp seems to think they've gotten away with pointing the finger back at the McCain camp over accusing Obama of supporting a bill that would mandate teaching kids about sex before they learn to read.

Not so fast.

National Review's Byron York has a great piece today on SB 99, the bill Barack keeps trying to say was only to protect kids from inappropriate touching and encouraging age-appropriate sex education.

This sex ed thing is a peculiarly touchy one in liberal circles (pardon the pun). They're incredibly sensitive to this issue (pardon the pun again.) Just what is "age appropriate" sex ed? Who determines what that is?

In Illinois circles, those groups promoting comprehensive sex ed often referred to the standards set up by SIECUS (Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States). SIECUS standards for comprehensive sex ed are available online here in the 2004 form. The legislation and standards set the year before on SB 99 were the same as these.

This is what Barack Obama voted to promote among Illinois kindergartners (age 5) through 2nd grade (age 8) with his support of SB 99:


Developmental Messages: Level 1 (ages 5-8)

• Each body part has a correct name and a specific function.
• A person’s genitals, reproductive organs, and genes determine whether the person is male or female.
• A boy/man has nipples, a penis, a scrotum, and testicles.
• A girl/woman has breasts, nipples, a vulva, a clitoris, a vagina, a uterus, and ovaries.
• Some sexual or reproductive organs, such as penises and vulvas, are external or on the outside of
the body while others, such as ovaries and testicles, are internal or inside the body.
• Both boys and girls have body parts that feel good when touched.• Vaginal intercourse – when a penis is placed inside a vagina – is the most common way for a sperm and egg to join.
(Page 26)

Developmental Messages, Level 1 (ages 5-8)

• Most children are curious about their bodies.
• Bodies can feel good when touched.
(Page 51. Interesting language, "Most children are...." Wouldn't be any peer pressure there, now would there?)

Topic 2:Masturbation
Subconcept: Masturbation is one way human beings express their sexuality.
Developmental Messages:
Level 1
• Touching and rubbing one’s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation.
• Some boys and girls masturbate and others do not.
• Masturbation should be done in a private place.
(Pages 51-52)

Topic 3:Shared Sexual Behavior
Subconcept: Individuals express their sexuality with a partner in diverse ways.
Developmental Messages:
Level 1
• People often kiss, hug, touch, and engage in other sexual behaviors with one another to show caring and to feel good. (Page 52)

Topic 5:Human Sexual Response

Subconcept: Female and male bodies respond both similarly and differently to sexual stimulation.
Developmental Messages:
Level 1
• Both girls and boys may discover that their bodies feel good when touched. (Page 54)

*********

Thanks to Wisconsin's Arlen Williams for helping us locate this info. . . more to come.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Health/Medicine; Politics
KEYWORDS: education; obamabiden; obamatruthfile; sexed; sexeducation
Teachers to students aged 5-8:

1. Here are the sexual parts of bodys. 2. It feels good to play with them. 3. Masturbation should be done in privagte. 4. Here is what the sex act is. 5. Couples engages in sex to show caring and to feel good.

And now you can avoid sexual predators!

1 posted on 09/22/2008 12:54:55 PM PDT by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: unspun

"boys have a penis, girls have a vagina"
2 posted on 09/22/2008 1:10:57 PM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
You highlighted a few points here, but there is something more subtle going on with the first point:

Each body part has a correct name and a specific function.

This is designed to undermine parental authority and make the children place trust in the "educators" over their parents. Specifically, the "educators" will ridicule the little euphemisms given for body parts and bathroom activities by the children's parents, and then the "educators" will give the children the "correct" names and say their parents lied to them. Then since the "educators" have established that parents lie, they go on to undermine the sexual purity of the children through the other points.

After seeing how fixated the left is on sex, and making people as sexually active as possible, I wonder if there is a strong connection between sex and liberalism. Does extramarital and premarital sex make one more likely to be a liberal? Or does defining oneself in sexual terms do so? It would be an interesting study.

3 posted on 09/22/2008 1:16:33 PM PDT by dan1123 (If you want to find a person's true religion, ask them what makes them a "good person".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
"Boy, I sure can't wait to get home from kindergarden. I'm gonna find some place private so I can touch it to see if it really feels good. Maybe later I'll ask Johnny and Cindy if I can touch theirs, so I can make them feel good and let them know that I'm their friend and I care about them"

Jeez, what the flipping heck is wrong with the people who think this appropriate to teach 5 to 8 year olds? Are they total morons or are THEY the ones with pedophilia on their minds? Sexuality is dormant and undiscovered at that age, as it should be. LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE you disgusting freaks!

4 posted on 09/22/2008 1:24:58 PM PDT by DCBurgess58 (McCain/Palin, That's the ticket!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dan1123

Obama said the bill was about protecting children from sex predators: yet the bill itself defines as follows: The following terms shall have the following meanings respectively prescribed for them, except as the context otherwise requires: (a) “Comprehensive Health Education Program”: a systematic and extensive educational program designed to provide a variety of learning experiences based upon scientific knowledge of the human organism as it functions within its environment which will favorably influence the knowledge, attitudes, values and practices of Illinois school youth; and which will aid them in making wise personal decisions in matters of health. (Source: P.A. 77‑1405.)


5 posted on 09/22/2008 1:33:37 PM PDT by NoDRodee (U>S>M>C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Illuminating!


6 posted on 09/22/2008 1:46:44 PM PDT by newzjunkey (McCain-Palin! YES CA Prop 4. (Family notification for underage abortions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoDRodee

Obama is a damn liar! He’s all for destroying the innocence of these 5-8 year old babies.

After all, he was mentored throughout his youth by gay Communists.

No wonder his thinking on these matters is warped, to say the least.


7 posted on 09/22/2008 1:51:04 PM PDT by Palladin (Sarahnoia will destroy ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unspun

How about no sex education for kindergarteners? As a parent, I will teach my child about sexual predators.


8 posted on 09/22/2008 1:52:51 PM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58
Since you're in Texas, allow this CA Freeper to shed some light on the subject.

We have a powerful Democrat legislator called Mark Leno. Democrats control the legislature with a near supermajority. With the party's support, Mark 'the pedo's pal' Leno is running for State Senate and beat the incumbent Democrat, a lesbian, in the primaries earlier this year. With a 52% Democatic registration in the district, his victory is assured.

As Chair of the Assembly Public Safety Committee, Mark Leno killed several victims’ rights bills including those (AB 221) which deny early release credits to inmate who have committed violent sex offenses, (AB 335) which would have required judges to consider child molestation a serious offense for purposes of bail and required electronic monitoring if released on bail.

He voted NO (AB 39) on increasing penalties for possession of child porn, NO (AB 350/SB 629) on tracking sex offenders through DMV renewals, NO (AB 1513) on preventing sexual predators contact with minors while in prison, NO (AB2068) on prohibiting sex offenders from living within 1/4 mile of schools regardless of parole, NO (AB 1442) to require GPS monitoring of sex offenders on parole. He opposes porn filters in public libraries (World News Tonight, April 2, 2002). Called a sting of internet sexual predators by SF police, "a waste of taxpayer's money, it is completely mean-spirited" (Sacramento Bee, Sept 26, 1999).

Make no mistake about it. The on-going agenda of the Democratic party is the widespread sexualization of children as Obama's efforts show. Folks you are obsessing over the "homosexual agenda" bogeyman are missing the big picture.

9 posted on 09/22/2008 2:25:37 PM PDT by newzjunkey (McCain-Palin! YES CA Prop 4. (Family notification for underage abortions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unspun
This is just one of many issues that cries out for a vote for McCain in November.

Those who are undecided, please consider what an Obama presidency would mean.

10 posted on 09/22/2008 2:32:14 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

“All in all they’re just another brick in the wall....”


11 posted on 09/22/2008 2:34:36 PM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh


Penetrating Insights into the Obvious
12 posted on 09/22/2008 2:48:31 PM PDT by MichaelAsher54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dan1123
After seeing how fixated the left is on sex, and making people as sexually active as possible, I wonder if there is a strong connection between sex and liberalism. Does extramarital and premarital sex make one more likely to be a liberal? Or does defining oneself in sexual terms do so? It would be an interesting study.

I think you are right about this and the dynamics take place with the liberal believer on a level beneath rational.

And the same holds true for many who would call themselves "libertarian" or "fiscally conservative, but...."

13 posted on 09/22/2008 2:52:18 PM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun
"If you don't beat your meat, you can't have any pudding... How can you have any pudding if you don't beat your meat'?

LOL, did I just say that... Bad me!!

14 posted on 09/22/2008 3:04:23 PM PDT by DCBurgess58 (McCain/Palin, That's the ticket!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

Not far from it.


15 posted on 09/22/2008 3:08:05 PM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: murron

How about no sex education for kindergarteners? As a parent, I will teach my child about sexual predators.


Amazing concept isn’t it?

But you have to remember it doesn’t fit the hypocrat godless liberal NEA agenda.

It’s past time for Americans to rise up against such a blatantly failed mess.

With more and more going homeschooling and private schools the writing is on the wall.

Normal epople shouldn’t be forced to pay for TWO schools....the one’s they send their kids to AND failed liberal ones too!

It’s ridiculous.


16 posted on 09/22/2008 4:06:25 PM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dan1123
After seeing how fixated the left is on sex, and making people as sexually active as possible, I wonder if there is a strong connection between sex and liberalism. Does extramarital and premarital sex make one more likely to be a liberal? Or does defining oneself in sexual terms do so? It would be an interesting study.

I think you are right. It is also the primary reason that some call themselves "libertarian," rather than conservative or Republican, IMHO.

The sexual revolution will go down in history as a movement as atrocious as those of the Nazis, Lenin/Stalin, and Mao.

17 posted on 09/22/2008 5:12:27 PM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson