Posted on 07/26/2008 4:23:30 AM PDT by Amityschild
NOTE by TexasDarlin:
This is the second article in a two-part series by Judah Benjamin challenging the Constitutionality of Barack Obama’s bid for President.
This article was preceded by my Foreword, and by the author’s Part 1, which explores the legal history and definition of “natural born citizen” under Article II of the US Constitution. Those two posts should be read first, and in full.
Part 2 explores the factual basis for Barack Obama’s dual citizenship, and concludes that he has been a citizen of at least two countries, and therefore is ineligible to be President.
(Excerpt) Read more at texasdarlin.wordpress.com ...
This, in plain terms means that a Dual National could not, under any circumstances, be Eligible. Additionally, if Naturalized Citizens are Ineligible because of the Legal principle of “The Appearance of Foreign Allegiance” which they are, and always have been, a former Dual National/Dual Citizen MUST be in exactly the same position vis a vis Article II.
Senator Obama has created this problem. It is purely and absolutely his own fault that he has not “come clean” about his childhood, youth and background. If a problem exists, he didn’t initially create it but he has covered it up in so many layers of obfuscation and outright untruth that he has made things much worse and much more complicated than they need to be.
I still want to see a certified copy of his birth certificate. Something fishy is going on there too.
And why did Senators McCaskill and Obama reportedly insert the following Clause?
“Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President;”
This Clause has no particular relevance to McCain and the following Clause, which it is reported McCaskill and Obama attempted to REMOVE shows that:
and Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936.”
It seems clear that McCaskill and Obama were attempting to create a blanket Resolution covering ALL Foreign Born candidates. Why do that if not to benefit a Foreign Born Democratic Candidate who did not have a US Military background?
McCain did not need this resolution, Richardson did not need this Resolution; so far as I can see no-body needed this Resolution unless somebody in the race was born outside the USA and was “Covering his/her Ass” and the only individual in the race that that could apply to was Senator Obama!
This in turn would show that the Senator is a liar who has been peddling untruths about his birth for at least 16 years!
Oh well. It doesn’t matter who is the new President. The current congress and Bush are putting us on the hook for untold trillions with this housing and Freddie/Fannie Mae bailouts. We’re toast.
It is all a waste of time and effort. Whatever is true, if anything disabling is brought to light Congress will take care of it within 48 hours of the determination that is disabling by passing whatever is necessary to declare him a “natural born Citizen.” And if that happens maybe the Crats will go about calling each other “Citizen!” which is sort of the English for the French word that became “Comrade!” farther east.
Ping!
Well written! Bump
Emphasis:
There should be a paper trail in US State and Federal and Foreign Government Records to prove, or disprove, my views. In fact, there must be and if there is not then it follows that somebody has removed the trail. If they have there has been a criminal conspiracy.
ping
ping
ping
Writing this article has brought me face to face with huge quantities of disinformation. Had the Obama Campaign and their allies not laid such a thick smokescreen, obscuring facts going back to 1942, for much of his mother’s record has also been extensively doctored, the task would have been relatively easy.
It would be fair to say that I have never seen anything like it and I suspect very few other people have either. This matter should never have got this far. I cannot even at this point say that Senator Obama has committed a crime or broken the Law but I have never seen such a twisted version of Legality and it cannot be an accident.
The Senator knows the truth but he won’t admit to it and he may well be the only surviving witness to what happened back in 1966 and 1971.
>>>he may well be the only surviving witness to what happened back in 1966 and 1971<<<
I had to back track to part 1 and am still reading. What happened? What is this referencing? Is this just referring to the suspected name changes?
>>>THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
It is an indisputable fact that Barack Obama spent his formative years in Indonesia. It is an indisputable fact that his mother married Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo (hereafter called Lolo Soetoro). It is an indisputable fact that Senator Obama attended two Indonesian schools and that the records of one of those schools still existed in the year 2007.<<<
cross linking:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2041173/posts
AUDIO OF INTERVIEW WITH MALIK OBAMA: B.H. OBAMA HOW ISRAEL NEED NOT WORRY
ping
A) I am absolutely certain that such a Document exists, that it existed in 1966/67 and that it exists today.
____________________________
I'm rereading as well. So much information! I also wondered about the point in A) about the existance of his BC in 1966/67.
Could the years refer to his enrollment in Indonesian schools and entrance into Hawaii?
Ref from TxDarl:
>>An American Expat in Southeast Asia (blog), ‘Tracking Down Obama in Indonesia’ Part 1 ,20 January 2007, Part 2, 23 January 2007, Part 3, 24 January 2007<<<
He has more on this coming out in Corsi’s book this August.
Oh, I'm going to have to read this multiple times too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.