Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s BIG Birth Certificate PROBLEM (Freeper credited)
No Quarter ^ | 6/20/08 | Staff

Posted on 06/21/2008 10:56:04 AM PDT by pissant

I have acquired additional information related to my earlier posts today (at my blog) on the subject of Barack Obama’s ‘Certification of Live Birth.’

My first post on this subject, Obama Birth Certificate, Fake?, included an analysis that I came across by a blogger named Polarik, who concluded based on “20 years of experience in computers, printers, and typewriters” that the document provided by the Obama campaign (and published by Daily Kos) was manufactured.

In a subsequent post, Certification of Birth from Hawaii: Where’s the Seal?, I showed a ‘Certification of Live Birth’ from Honolulu County for Patricia Decosta, which I found posted at Free Republic (thanks to reader shainzona). (And yes, I know it’s a “right wing” publication but that does not make the information false).

Here is the document posted by the Obama campaign on its Fight the Smears website as evidence of Obama’s birth in Hawaii in 1961:

And here is Ms. Decosta’s certification:

Now, compare the two documents. Polarik’s technical analysis notwithstanding, my lay person’s eye noticed three differences right away:

1. Ms. Decosta’s certification displays fold marks, which you might expect to see on a document sent through the mail.

2. The certificate number on Obama’s document is blacked out; Ms. Decosta’s is not.

AND

3. An embossed seal is visible on Ms. Decosta’s certification; there is no embossed seal on Obama’s. (You can see the embossed seal very clearly on the larger image at FR here.)

The Vital Records office in Hawaii has confirmed the following with respect to requests for certified copies of birth certificates:

1. Certifications of live birth are always mailed from the VR office, and never transmitted electronically.

2. Certificate numbers are never blacked out.

AND

3. Certifications will always have an embossed seal.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; fraud; hawii; kos; larrysinclairslover; obama; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-270 next last
Obama's fraudulent birth certification is now being exposed from the right and the lefties. LOL

Trouble is brewing.

And a guy who would fake a birth certification wouldn't be capable of sharing BJs and coke with a gay cruiser now would he?

1 posted on 06/21/2008 10:56:04 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited; Lancey Howard; BossLady; txflake

Ping a ling


2 posted on 06/21/2008 10:57:32 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Excellent work, pissant.
3 posted on 06/21/2008 10:59:11 AM PDT by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Yep, I mentioned the missing embossing seal the first time it was posted.

Maybe Dan can tell us for sure?

4 posted on 06/21/2008 10:59:22 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I’ll admit it will be funny if something comes about with this. I mean, the Lefties were so gung-ho that McCain couldn’t be president because he was born in the Canal Zone that if something in Hussein’s background such as this does him in, well, THAT will be hilarious.


5 posted on 06/21/2008 10:59:37 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Be careful! Communist ideas may give you brain cancer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is there any doubt as to whether Obama’s mother was an American citizen? No. Therefore, Obama is an American citizen. End of story.


6 posted on 06/21/2008 11:00:26 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Good job!


7 posted on 06/21/2008 11:01:51 AM PDT by monkeycard (There's no such thing as too much ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
They had computers in 1961 that could create these documents?
This is fraud, and Obama has some splainin to do.

I wonder is he's even a US citizen..

8 posted on 06/21/2008 11:02:32 AM PDT by MaxMax (I'll welcome death when God calls me. Until then, the fight is on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

And I noticed that the alignment of the intersections of the bottom corner borders of the version on KOS’s webiste and the version on Obama’s website was different. Meaning this thing is being printed up from different printers, OR, someone ‘corrected’ it after spotting the error. In theory, they were jpgs of the same document. LOL


9 posted on 06/21/2008 11:02:36 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Notice the first one says ‘date filed by the registrar’ and the second one says ‘date accepted by the registrar’?
10 posted on 06/21/2008 11:03:14 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

No, this is the way they do it now. That part is legit. But Obama’s version just happens to be a fraudulent version of the modern computer printed document.


11 posted on 06/21/2008 11:03:46 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I did not notice that.


12 posted on 06/21/2008 11:04:12 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Not if he was born elsewhere.


13 posted on 06/21/2008 11:04:46 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
They had computers in 1961 that could create these documents?

Big mistake a lot of folks are making. These are Certification of Birth, not original Birth Certificates. They could have been printed yesterday by a registrar's office.

14 posted on 06/21/2008 11:04:49 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Look, I'm not one to stand and defend Obama or his minions - but before we get too excited, note a few things:

The comparison presented is from someone born 30 years earlier, and before statehood - I know my Virginia birth certificate looks different than my mother's, so would I expect some revisions over the years. Let's look at one from a similar timeframe before we get too hot and bothered.

Likewise, with the folding - the last new copy of my birth certificate I ordered, it came in a large manilla envelope, and has still not been creased with a fold to this day. And yet, *gasp* it's REAL.

We're really reaching, here. If it's fake, let's prove it - but let's not breathlessly report things that are probably inconsequential.
15 posted on 06/21/2008 11:05:20 AM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
2. Certificate numbers are never blacked out.

If the certificate is a fraud and the certificate number was not blacked out, it would seem to be easy to check the certificate number against the name. Therefore, the only reason for it to be blacked out is to avoid checking for fraud.

16 posted on 06/21/2008 11:06:04 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
They also both say Rev 11/01 which should indicate that they Certification's details would be the same as they are from the same registration batch (ie, something happened in 11/01 (updates to the privacy act jumps to mind for me) that made them change something on the certificate, be it paper, watermarks, included information, etc). Different information included, along with different paper should indicate a different revision.

Just to be sure, I would like to see three or four others so we know where the flaw is.

I also wouldn't use the blacked out number as proof. Obama’s office may have done this simply for privacy reasons.

17 posted on 06/21/2008 11:08:06 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The lefties are not above forging documents as the Dan Rather fake document based “news report” in 2004 proved.


18 posted on 06/21/2008 11:08:10 AM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Redefeat Communism by defeating the Obamanation in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Under Father's Race, it states “African”. Africa is a continent, not a race. I would think that if the formal names of Caucasian and Negro were not used in 1961, then White and Black would have been used. I'm curious to see an unaltered birth certificate from that era for a black child.
19 posted on 06/21/2008 11:08:18 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

It’s a fake. And freepers helped establsih that fact. But the best work is from a Townhall blogger:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2032572/posts


20 posted on 06/21/2008 11:09:25 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson