Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who In The Hell Is Behind $5 Gas?
Doug Ross @ Journal ^ | June 7, 2008 | Doug Ross

Posted on 06/08/2008 10:15:16 AM PDT by TennTuxedo

Saturday, June 07, 2008 Who in the hell is behind $5 gas?

John Hinderaker explains:

For several decades, the Democratic Party has pursued policies designed to drive up the cost of petroleum, and therefore gas at the pump. Remarkably, the Democrats don't seem to have taken much of a political hit from the current spike in gas prices. Probably that's because most people don't realize how different the two parties' energy policies have been.

(Excerpt) Read more at directorblue.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 110th; abuse; democrats; energy; energyprices; gas; gasprices
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
"Flopping Aces: follows up on this educational exhibit with more supportive and damning information.

Flopping Aces: Placing Blame For The Price of Gas

This is some damning information that should be shared with every newspaper and voter in this country.

1 posted on 06/08/2008 10:15:17 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

As a counter point what have the GOP done to remedy this???????

While the price was lower there were plenty of forecasts about the increase in demand coming.

2 posted on 06/08/2008 10:21:22 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

The policies espoused by Democrats, with the aid of their “environmentalist”, lead directly to higher gasoline prices. And as the latest snub at the consumer, they won’t even go for a moratorium on the federal gas tax.


3 posted on 06/08/2008 10:21:50 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Does Obama know ANYONE who likes America, capitalism, or white people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

This article is a bit short in the reality department.


4 posted on 06/08/2008 10:22:36 AM PDT by RightWhale (We see the polygons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2027931/posts

VDH wondering what’s up too..


5 posted on 06/08/2008 10:24:27 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

ping


6 posted on 06/08/2008 10:25:18 AM PDT by SideoutFred (Save us from the Looney Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo
If the Pubs were interested in winning in a landslide in Nov, they would talk about nothing but the difference in energy policies between the Pubs and the Rats, and how the Rats energy policies have gotten us to oil and gas prices we have today.

Americans get the oil and gas prices they deserve.

7 posted on 06/08/2008 10:28:00 AM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

“Probably that’s because most people don’t realize how different the two parties’ energy policies have been.”

Just another huge example of what a handicap it is having a president who cannot clearly and firmly articulate the policies he supports, and the harm done by the policies advocated by the Dems. There are tremendous political points to be scored now explaining how the Dems. have made it impossible for the US to bring significant new energy resources into the supply line. But few points are being scored for the Republicans.

And, in their great wisdom, some 38% of Republicans have nominated another candidate with little more ability to articulate policy differences and their consequences. Except the policy differences are even fewer if he wins. He’s made significant contributions to our current dependence on imported oil, and is more in line with the Dems. than with the Republicans on energy policy.


8 posted on 06/08/2008 10:28:34 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo

If I recall correctly, Al Gore said in, “Earth in the Balance” that $5 gas would be good for the environment.

At the time he said it, it was inconceivable.


9 posted on 06/08/2008 10:29:21 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

Everyone’s talking about the price of gasoline. Well, I can work around that in a number of ways IF I have to. But, heating oil is a little different. Especially in northern states. It’s gonna be a matter of life and death for many people this winter AND no one’s talking about it!!! And, no one will care because the election will be over......


10 posted on 06/08/2008 10:30:33 AM PDT by MrLee (Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TennTuxedo; RightWhale
Local RAT / enviro whacko action is also to blame ... read this and there should be no wonder as to what kind of stranglehold the greenies have on our refinery capacity: Richmond limits Chevron's crude oil
11 posted on 06/08/2008 10:35:22 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (I tried to explain that I meant it as a compliment, but that only appears to have made things worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Yeah, that’s kind of funny seeing the ululators protesting our economic life blood. They should build a huge coal to liquids plant there.


12 posted on 06/08/2008 10:38:04 AM PDT by RightWhale (We see the polygons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; TennTuxedo
This article is a bit short in the reality department.

That is really a very absurd statement coming from you with your unwavering faith in the myth of "Peak Oil". It would seem you might want to have a professional check your own grasp of reality before your start criticizing anyone else's.

13 posted on 06/08/2008 10:38:38 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Have you read ‘The Prize’?


14 posted on 06/08/2008 10:40:13 AM PDT by RightWhale (We see the polygons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
16 separate filibusters lead by the Democrats of the GOP Energy plan.

Anyone here paying any attention to what is going on in DC or are Freeper all to busy bitching about the GOP to learn anything anymore?

15 posted on 06/08/2008 10:40:46 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
We all need to send these messages to our newspapers and send the message in these columns to our friends and explain to them that if they want to continue to pay higher gas prices then they should continue to vote for the Democrats.

If they want to lower their gas and energy prices, then they should vote for the Republican candidates in the elections.

16 posted on 06/08/2008 10:41:48 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I’m sorry your find the truth so disturbing.


17 posted on 06/08/2008 10:42:43 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

You know, I worked on the TransAlaska Oil Pipeline construction and the development of Prudhoe Bay. I might have noticed or heard something along the way.


18 posted on 06/08/2008 10:45:59 AM PDT by RightWhale (We see the polygons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Isn't Yergin one of the chief anti-peak-oilers out there? He says there's still plenty left.

To put some reality into the conversation, someone needs to detail just how much oil we can realistically expect to get from ANWR or the OCS and other domestic sources, both in terms of billions of barrels, and in terms of millions of barrels per day of production. And how long it will take to bring these online.

19 posted on 06/08/2008 10:46:28 AM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I suggest you 1st step might be to read more of these Energy threads and post much much less. You seem hell bent on ignoring all facts that challenge your personal opinions.


20 posted on 06/08/2008 10:47:30 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson