Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Has Thompson Done?
www.race42008.com ^ | Jason

Posted on 03/27/2007 1:09:31 PM PDT by jbonham76

I listed my qualms about him a few days ago. Right now I would consider McCain and Rudy above Fred, but not Brownback. This solely rests upon the fact that other than voting correctly and saying good things on Paul Harvey, I am very skeptical of Thompson’s ability to,

1. Formulate good policy (detail work)

2. Negotiate with the other side and foreign governments

3. Run a organization (whether a campaign or an administration)

4. Something that shows those lazy accusations are not true (i.e. some where he has put forth good effort.)

I know that a lot of people look to him as a great hope, but I want to know why? What I am hoping is that someone here can tell me I need not worry if he was to win the nod. Is there something in Fred’s past I have missed? Please fill me in, in the comments section.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: flavor; fred; fredthompson; lazy; nothing; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2007 1:09:32 PM PDT by jbonham76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jbonham76
"I know that a lot of people look to him as a great hope, but I want to know why? "

Because he's not McCain or Giuliani.
2 posted on 03/27/2007 1:12:34 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76
You're skeptical? Who are you? If you consider McCain above him then you have no credibility on the subject. Sorry...
3 posted on 03/27/2007 1:13:19 PM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76
Does ideology not matter one whit to you?
4 posted on 03/27/2007 1:13:22 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76
Ok, but he has done no less than McCain. When did McCain run an organization? Same for most candidates. Sure Rudy did well with 911, but I'd rather have an incompetent who believes as I do than an efficient man getting rid of all I hold dear.
5 posted on 03/27/2007 1:15:15 PM PDT by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

"Because he's not McCain or Giuliani."

Or should I have said, he's not McPain or Ghouliani.


6 posted on 03/27/2007 1:16:47 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76
Let's see:

He served as a Senator for the State of Tennessee, holds traditional conservative values, and has no sleazy past to impune his character....

Yeah; you're right...he must be unqualified....

/sarc

7 posted on 03/27/2007 1:16:54 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Because he's not McCain or Giuliani.

That is exactly what I was going to write and you beat me to it on the second post!

8 posted on 03/27/2007 1:22:10 PM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret; All

Hey it does take more than ideology to be president. How about instead of spinning your wheels, you give me some solid input as to why Fred would do a good job in these categories.

So far you people have done is evade the real question: How is Fred qualified beyond ideology?

Thanks


9 posted on 03/27/2007 1:24:50 PM PDT by jbonham76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret

So do you like Fred Thompson?


10 posted on 03/27/2007 1:25:01 PM PDT by TommyDale ("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76

What has Thompson done?

Where are the guys demanding, "Pictures!!"


11 posted on 03/27/2007 1:30:27 PM PDT by Graymatter (Support FREDeralism in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76
Exactly what makes any candidate 'qualified' to be the POTUS? The answer depends upon who is being asked the question, and in reality their is no 'right' or 'wrong' answer. It comes down to what the majority prefers.

Character, ideology and 'gravitas' are the most important qualities, IMO.
12 posted on 03/27/2007 1:32:22 PM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76

You're asking too much... after all, ideology can tell you a great deal about how a person will:

Run the White House.
Staff and Run the Cabinet.
Run the Military as Commander In Chief.
Set legislative priorities and the legislative agenda.
Negotiate with Congress and persuade those on the fence.(*)
Communicate to the nation.(* and look/sound good doing it)
Staff and Run the Party.

No leadership credentials required. Just step in and start leading! I've put "*" where I think Fred is fully qualified and ready to lead.


13 posted on 03/27/2007 1:36:03 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("Salvation is not free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pox

I am pretty charismatic and I am very much an ideological conservative. Should I be President?

Can you please answer those first three questions?

I don't think it was Charisma that brought down the wall for Reagan.


14 posted on 03/27/2007 1:37:03 PM PDT by jbonham76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76

PS to my earlier reply: imagine Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, John Kerry or Algore trying to step into those leadership roles!


15 posted on 03/27/2007 1:38:20 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("Salvation is not free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Can't you just answer a simple question?

It's moronic to say ideological conservatives are all on the same par of intellect and management styles.

WIll you answer my questions?


16 posted on 03/27/2007 1:41:28 PM PDT by jbonham76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76

You're not charismatic to me, your ideology may fit, whether or not you can be president remains unknown until I can give you a 'once over' from head to foot and see if you have the 'presidential' look.

Also, I'm not so sure I feel a sense of 'brass balls' attached to you at this point, so you need to do a little more convincing! :)

But again, those are my personal prerogatives, and I'm sure others have more qualifications that they care about.

In reality, the qualifications have been spelled out in the Constitution, and after those are met it is a matter of personal preference.


17 posted on 03/27/2007 1:46:07 PM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76

I like Fred Thompson. But I'm very concerned that he would pick his close friend, the gentleloon from Arizona, as his running mate. Should they win, and Thompson not serve out his full term we'd be left with President McCain.

Even if Fred served out the full term, the thought of McCrazy as VP gives me nightmares.


18 posted on 03/27/2007 1:48:28 PM PDT by freespirited (Resentment, redistribution, and re-education. The three Rs of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbonham76
A little elbow grease online can bear much fruit. Found this right off the bat.

Senate Years of Service: 1994-2003
Party: Republican THOMPSON, Fred Dalton,
a Senator from Tennessee;
born in Sheffield, Ala., on August 19, 1942;
attended the public schools in Lawrenceburg, Tenn.;
graduated from Memphis State University 1964;
received J.D. degree from Vanderbilt University 1967;
admitted to the Tennessee bar in 1967 and commenced the practice of law;
assistant U.S. attorney 1969-1972;
minority counsel, Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities (“Watergate Committee”) 1973-1974;
special counsel to Tennessee Governor Lamar Alexander 1980;
special counsel, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 1980-1981;
special counsel, Senate Intelligence Committee 1982;
member, Tennessee Appellate Court Nominating Commission 1985-1987;
actor;
elected as a Republican to the United States Senate in the November 8, 1994, special election to fill the unexpired portion of the term ending January 3, 1997, left vacant by the resignation of Albert Gore, Jr.;
took the oath of office on December 2, 1994;
reelected in 1996 for the term ending January 3, 2003;
not a candidate for reelection in 2002;
chair, Committee on Governmental Affairs (One Hundred Fifth and One Hundred Sixth Congresses;
One Hundred Seventh Congress [January 20, 2001-June 6, 2001]);
resumed acting career.

19 posted on 03/27/2007 1:50:36 PM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (THOMPSON/GINGRICH '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
That is a concern, but it is still preferable to RINO Rudy, IMO.
20 posted on 03/27/2007 1:50:44 PM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson