Posted on 02/01/2007 7:10:42 PM PST by RedRover
From: David Sheldon
To: Investigating Officer
Subj: Article 32 hearing ICO United States v. Phan
Date: 28 January 2007
Sir,
1. On behalf of my client, I wanted to state for the record the following:
(a) The defense believes a classification review should be undertaken without delay. We ask you to make this recommendation;
(b) Your recommendation that an investigation into the testimony and conduct of both certain NCIS agents and the three Marines at issue should be initiated and is appropriate. These matters are important as you well recognized;
(c) Your recommendation regarding counsel should include the trial team as well. It became abundantly clear that Major Plowman and Captain Gannon became witnesses when as Major Plowman said "I believe this witness (LCPL Kraus) is lying regarding whether or not he met with me in August of last year." I should note that Lance Corporal Kraus testified that he did not remember meeting with Major Plowman. Additionally, I have concerns about the testimony of two junior, enlisted Marines who testified that two members of the prosecution team, a Captain and a Staff Sergeant Logan, may have sought to improperly threaten them and/or improperly influence their testimony. The defense team has acted in a manner consistent with their ethical obligations. Your comments that these Marines' affidavits were "colored by a third party" are without any basis in fact. As you well know, all three Marines testified under oath repeatedly that their affidavits were voluntary and accurate;
(d) Finally, I am deeply concerned about your repeated statements regarding the credibility of witnesses and the validity of the charges on and off the record prior to hearing all of the evidence or commencing your deliberation. Your comments that you will use your personal experiences and beliefs with respect to operations in Iraq as a bellwether for what is and isn't legal and what is or isn't credible in the present case, and your representation that you intend to use your personal past experiences and relationships with NCIS and its agents, are equally disturbing. In my 16 years of practice, I have never seen an investigating officer or military judge make such patently biased and inappropriate comments. Nor have I ever seen an investigating officer or military judge ever prevent a counsel from making a record as you did just prior to the close of the hearing. Your actions clearly violated L T Phan' s right to a fair and impartial hearing and were an attempt by you to play to the media in order to put the Marine Corps and NCIS in the best possible light. Moreover, your obstreperous, condescending (to include your loud exaggerated sighs and eye rolling) behavior and repeated derogatory comments to Lt. Col. Cord during his closing comments were offensive and without precedence. In sum, you paid lip service to L T Phan's right to a full, fair and impartial Article 32 hearing.
I insist that you make this memorandum an exhibit and attach it to the record.
Copy to:
File
Trial Counsel
Convening Authority
The events in the hearing revealed grave doubts that our Marines are receiving due process from the very country they love and volunteered to service.
During the hearing, serious allegations surfaced that NCIS agents had fabricated statements by enlisted Marines. Three Marines gave affadavits to this fact. Their statements, prepared by NCIS agents and submitted as evidence by the prosecution, contained falsehoods.
Yet when one of the Marines, Lance Cpl. Andrew Kraus, took the stand to testify under oath in regard to his affadavit, he was immediately arrested and led from the courtroom.
At the same time, an NCIS agent accused of fabricating statements was allowed to avoid testifying under oath. The prosecution claimed that the agent was in Australia and could not be reached.
The North County Times first obtained David Sheldon's memorandum on January 30th. In an article headlined, Attorney: Accused Camp Pendleton Marine didn't get fair hearing, the paper quoted and summarized its contents.
I cannot reveal my source for this memorandum, but have no doubt of the memo's legitimacy. Quotes from it appeared in print.
The full text of the memorandum is given for the first time ever here on Free Republic.
Attorney says agents made up assault case evidence
Accused Marine’s hearing resumes Friday
Major thread: Witness for Marine lieutenant threatened with criminal charges
EXCELLENT! Another FR exclusive. GOOD work, Red Rover!
Here's the full document quoted in the NC Times article linked above.
If you're not already included, let jazusamo or me know if you want on the Haditha Marine Ping List.
Thank you for the ping. :)
mo
Thanks. Prayers for our guys.
Thank you for the ultimate post.
Hiya, onyx! Great to see you. Yes, this document can only be seen right now on Free Republic. But I have a feeling it'll start popping up on military blogs very soon. ;)
Thanks! God bless our Marines!
Good work, RedRover. Thanks for posting this.
Excellent work!
(((((onyx))))) Bless you, my dear FRiend!
Great job!
Ping to you.
This sounds like the Duke LaCross Case. Another DA Nifong?
Thanks for the ping... Interesting reading... :)
Sounds like Breaker Morant.
Imagine men returning from the battlefield to be Nifonged like this. It truly makes my blood boil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.