Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naming Our Enemies
TCS Daily ^ | 9/6/2006 | Arnold Kling

Posted on 09/06/2006 7:07:16 AM PDT by Jane2005

"Ideally, in the case of a right (for example, the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures) that could be asserted against government measures for protecting national security, one would like to locate the point at which a slight expansion in the scope of the right would subtract more from public safety than it would add to personal liberty and [conversely]. That is the point of balance, that determines the optimal scope of the right." -- Richard A. Posner, Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency, p. 31

Judge Richard Posner's new book on the relationship between anti-terrorist tactics and civil liberties, is larded with the language of economics. It is filled with discussions of trade-offs, costs and benefits, marginal decision-making, and other economic concepts. Ironically, given my background in economics, the results left me longing for a more clear-cut, legalistic statement.

For Posner, a central problem is that terrorism is, in his words sui generis (now there's something that's not in the economic vocabulary), meaning that it does not fall neatly under the heading of either crime or war. The way I would put this is that terrorists are neither suspects nor soldiers. Until someone commits an act of terrorism, there is no crime, and hence no suspect. And because they act to conceal their status as combatants (as opposed to a combatant who merely tries to conceal himself by camouflage or hiding), terrorists are not soldiers.

(Excerpt) Read more at tcsdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; antiterrorist; civilliberties; enemies; terorism

1 posted on 09/06/2006 7:07:17 AM PDT by Jane2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jane2005
It might be more difficult to classify Hamas or Hezbollah, but my initial thinking would be to designate them only as terrorist organizations, without declaring them enemies of the United States. I recognize that this is a debatable point.

This guy is a judge?
Scary.

Both those groups have already killed Americans wholesale, by their own admission. How does that create a bar to calling them what they are: our enemies?

2 posted on 09/06/2006 7:45:20 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane2005

One thing the author fails to clarify is to be a TRAITOR of the US you first have to be a citizen of the US.


3 posted on 09/09/2006 1:16:37 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson