Lies: Serbian Massacres

Southern Pundit ^ | 8-23-2006 | James P

[JamesP81]

One of the more odious lies that the far left and the media has successfully propagated centers around the alleged Serbian ethnic cleansing of ethnic Albanians.

At the time, US government officials, such as Ambassador David Sheffer, were making hysterical claims that the death toll from Serbian ethnic cleansing was in the hundreds of thousands. NATO decided to move in and correct the situation. Not a bad idea, as far as ideas go, there’s just one problem: the ethnic cleansing that was the justification for war never happened. It’s all one gigantic lie.

[JamesP81]

This ping list tends to center around discussing the monumental big lies spread primarily by the far left and the media. If you want on or off the Lies pinglist, send me an FRMail.

[JamesP81]

Lies ping.

[JamesP81]

Lies ping.

[wagglebee]

When did the Serbs EVER indicate any ill-will toward the US? Not only did they lack the ability to threaten the US, they didn't even have the desire.

[Froufrou]

It turns out that when Slobodan Milosevic was protesting his innocence from his jail cell he was the one telling the truth, and everyone else was full of crap. Go figure.

Oh, crap! Look at the domino effect and it's like being sucked down a maelstrom!

[wagglebee]

I still have a hard time believing that Milosevic died of natural causes. I think somebody got very nervous about what he was going to say in his trial. I always thought that it was peculiar that his trial was postponed for such a very long time, it's as if a lot of people never wanted him to stand trial.

[JamesP81]

I still have a hard time believing that Milosevic died of natural causes. I think somebody got very nervous about what he was going to say in his trial.

Well, maybe. Normally I wouldn't think so, but the UN can be as venal and petty as any tyrant, so I wouldn't put it past them either.

[Froufrou]

I hadn't thought of that, or him, in this light before now. What you say makes sense. What's the saying? "Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."

[GoodWithBarbarians JustForKaos]

"Folks, this is a situation where criticism of US foreign policy was absolutely justified. The cold unyielding truth is that we were on the wrong side in that war. We helped Islamic Fascists..."

I don't remember all these peace-nik groups denouncing the Commander of Cigars for attacking the Serbs, that were fighting terrorists, anywhere near as much as now when we're fighting terrorists. Would they have been more vocal if a Republican president did this? Of course! If we had attacked the actual terrorists? Wouldn't surprise me. Why are some of them always against America, capitalism and the free world? Communist (ACLU, ANSWER etc.) and terrorist ties (Code Pink)??? They only chant peace when it supports their agendas. Hypocrites with no morals or integrity! The corrupt MSM helps their PR to pull the wool over the eyes of the naive, while hiding their affiliations.

It's more than ironic that the media's favorite Prez did even more (or less - re: bin Laden) than terrorists could of possibly hoped for. The enemy within is greater and more dangerous than ever. But, at least the alternative media is gradually exposing it to more and more people. We absolutely can not let these anti-Americans regain control of either House of Congress. The RINOs need a lesson, but not if it allows for terrorist victories, at this crucial time in the WOT. IMHO

[JamesP81]

Southern Pundit is full of it on this issue. I guess those mass graves were all Serbians huh?

Not all, but many of them were. And the number of deaths were a very small fraction of what the Clintonites were hysterically claiming they were. You might want to read some of NATO's and the UN's later reports about that.

I see you just registered today. Welcome to FR.