Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Potential Republican Crack-Up

Posted on 07/31/2005 1:19:25 PM PDT by KMB

For the past 20 years, there's been a discussion in political circles and the media about the "fault lines" in the Republican party over the hot-button social issues such as the death penalty, abortion, affirmative action and gay rights.

The presumption has always been that these issues would ultimately cause a rift between conservatives and moderates that would split the Republican coalition. The pundits and the MSM have been expecting and predicting this split for as long as I've been watching politics and they've been puzzled by the fact that it has never occurred.

I believe that the reason that it hasn't occurred is that the underlying assumptions are wrong. There are no "moderate" Republicans. I think Republicans are almost all conservative. Today, there are no Republicans left who are philosophically in line with Nelson Rockefeller, John Anderson, Lowell Weicker or Mark Hatfield. I know that this line of reasoning may be challenged by the Maine & Rhode Island Republican senators but the Republicans in those states (who vote Republican in presidential elections) are conservatives. The New England Republican Senators get elected by appealing to Democrats in overwhelmingly Democratic states.

There were approximately 62 million people who voted for GW Bush in 2004. I believe that probably 61.5 million of those people (1) support the death penalty (2) oppose affirmative action and (3) oppose gay marriage. I also believe that an equally high percentage of Bush voters (even those who are pro-choice) believe that the Roe v. Wade case was a hideous decision.

Pro-choice Republicans also are aware of the dirty little secret of the abortion debate -- which is that even if Roe v. Wade were overturned tomorrow, there would probably be no effect... There are probably no more than 7 - 9 states where abortion would actually be outlawed and there are currently few (or no) abortion doctors practicing in those states today anyway. Overall, the number of abortions occurring in the next ten years would only be affected by 1% or less if Roe v. Wade were reversed.

So this is, I believe, why the Republican coalition never cracked or splintered. It has confounded and infuriated the opposition but the Republican coalition really never had the fault lines that so many people thought it had.

However, I now think that one may be developing. The impending divisions in the Republican party won't be "moderate" vs. "conservative". It will be "evangelical conservative" vs. "non evangelical conservative". The issues that cause the breach won't be abortion, the death penalty, gay marriage or affirmative action. Instead the divisions will be caused over: (1) stem cell research, (2) evolution and (3) the Terri Schiavo case.

I think that 25 years from now, we'll all look back on the Terri Schiavo case as a cataclysmic event in American politics. There were tens of millions of people who looked at the pictures of Terri Schiavo and thought just one thing: "My god, if that ever happens to me, pull the plug, stop the feeding or do whatever it takes to finish me off."

At the time many Republican leaders spoke of the fact that this was a unique case but the tone of the debate both in and out of the media was that this was essentially a first step.

I remember that pro-Brady Bill and pro-Assault weapons ban politicians repeatedly assured the public that this wouldn't mean banning guns while activists and media pundits indicated that this was a first step towards doing so.

With the Terri Schiavo case, activists -- evangelicals --similarly didn't view this as a unique case but as a first step towards preventing feeding tube or life support removal in any case regardless of living wills or not.

This had an effect on non-evangelical Republicans or "secular Republicans" . . . By itself, I don't think that it would be enough to cause a breach but this isn't just one issue. The other issues that are occurring at the same time are an inexplicable renewed debate over evolution and the stem cell research debate.

With regard to the former, there's no polite or nice way to put it so I'll just be direct. People who believe in evolution think that people who don't believe in evolution are idiots -- pure and simple. The perception that an evolution believer has of a non-evolution believer is of a person saying, "Duh, my grandfather wasn't no ape."

Secular Republicans look at people who publicly discuss their doubts about evolution and who don't want it taught in public schools with utter disgust.

With regard to stem cell research, secular Republicans are excited at the prospects and supportive of practically any scientific research and they simmer at the thought of obstruction of research on religious grounds.

These three issues: evolution, Terri Schiavo and stem cell research are close to causing (or may have already caused) an irrepairable breach in the Republican coalition.

I'm a conservative. I believed in a 2nd war against in Iraq to remove the regime of Saddam Hussein as early as 1998. I also believe in making the '01 & '03 tax cuts permanent; drilling in anwar; that members of al Qaeda who are captured are illegal soldiers and not entitled to due process. I believe in progressive indexing of SS benefits, support the confirmation of John Roberts, think Antonin Scalia is the ideal justice and favor ballistic missile defense.

I also support the death penalty, oppose affirmative action, oppose gay marriage and think that the Roe v. Wade decision was a farce. I could go on but the point is made -- I'm a conservative....

But, I also accept the truth that the human species has a pre-history and I support stem cell research and I think that keeping Terri Schiavo's existance without life going was cruel and sadistic. That feeding tube should've never been inserted 14 years ago.

As a result of all of this, I now find myself in a position that I would have never dreamed of 5 or 10 years ago which is that I object to Hillary Clinton far, far less than I object to Tom Delay. Or Rick Santorum. Or Sam Brownback. Or Tom Tancredi.

Hopefully, Rudy Guiliani will be the nominee in '08 and make this all a moot point but if he isn't then I'm confronted with the possibility that I'll probably vote for Hillary Clinton despite the fact that she stands against so much that I believe in.

If there are others like me out there, and I think there are, then get ready for a 2nd Clinton Administration.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 0wn3d; 0wn4g3; 0wned; 1dumbtroll; asphaultlikesit; clowns; dancingonkmbsgrave; darkshearesfault; deepcovertroll; duidiot; dumbassdunce; dumbassidiot; dumbassliberal; dumbasstroll; dumberthanhammers; dunce; dutroll; echoechoecho; facerules; headupass; hostiletakeover; ideservezot; ilovezot; molassesmiasma; notmyfault; own4g3; ownage; owned; ownzored; ozone; ozoneactionthread; penguinhumor; permanentminority; pwn3d; pwn4g3; pwnd; pwned; pwnz0r3d; spawnofundeadtrhread; trollishigh; trolloncrack; trollonpot; undeadroadtrip; undeadthread3; undernewmanagement; whowritesthisbs; wildturkeys; wppff; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 6,261-6,268 next last
To: Monkey Face

If I was a guy I wouldn't drink it and I would not give it to kids but I doubt it will do me any harm. In fact this third arm now makes typing so much easier. ;^)


281 posted on 07/31/2005 5:27:05 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Warning: May bite (Adjusts tin foil hat with stylish copper lining))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

Easy 'Face. This is a brand new thread.

Don't start talking dirty yet.


282 posted on 07/31/2005 5:27:16 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mighty and enduring? They are but toys of the moment to be overturned by the flicking of a finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

LOL! (It is also hard to digest.)

Your third arm is actually quite -um- overcoming.


283 posted on 07/31/2005 5:29:18 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face
How about Ice Cream Cones???

I would begin to lick the ice cream making sure that none of the ice cream trickled over the sides. Then I would lick the ice cream until it was dead even with the sugar cone. Then I would bite a hole in the bottom of the sugar cone and suck the ice cream out.

284 posted on 07/31/2005 5:29:22 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: KMB
That's who you'll have to thank for a Rodham-Clinton Administration. Let's just hope it doesn't come to that.

It sounds to me like you're hoping it does come to that. Anyone who would vote for Hitlery just because some Republicans (me for one) are opposed to fetal stem cell research is not likely to be a Republican of any variety, and is certainly not a conservative.

Why not just admit you're a DU troll and leave quietly before the ZOT axe falls on your neck?

285 posted on 07/31/2005 5:29:56 PM PDT by epow (Don't complain that thorns grow on rose bushes, thank God that roses grow on thorn bushes..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mware
I am a border line diabetic so I drink it as part of diet and exercise to keep the needle away.

The plain stuff was HORRIBLE. But they have a new kind out that is sweetened with splenda and it comes in vanilla and chocolate. Tisn't bad.

286 posted on 07/31/2005 5:30:37 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Warning: May bite (Adjusts tin foil hat with stylish copper lining))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

"...Don't start talking dirty yet."

I hate it when you play like the Vocabulary Police. *pouting*


287 posted on 07/31/2005 5:30:37 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

I love my tableware.
Great stuff.

Wish I had pilot wings though..


288 posted on 07/31/2005 5:31:22 PM PDT by Darksheare ("Just because I have a paper heart, doesn't mean tearing it is okay." -The man with the candy face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: epow

welcome to the thread. We had a deep cover troll. We are now discussing eating habits.


289 posted on 07/31/2005 5:31:28 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: mware

Yepper!

I like the sugar cones for that...yummy!


290 posted on 07/31/2005 5:31:49 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

I'll let you know when it's safe.


291 posted on 07/31/2005 5:32:15 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mighty and enduring? They are but toys of the moment to be overturned by the flicking of a finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face; NicknamedBob
... the Vocabulary Police.

:Perks up: Oooooo. NNB do you have handcuffs and everything?

292 posted on 07/31/2005 5:32:32 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Warning: May bite (Adjusts tin foil hat with stylish copper lining))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

Oh dear they are talking about the Donner/Packer incident.


293 posted on 07/31/2005 5:33:35 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: epow

Too late. Been zotted. We've taken over his netwok so he can't adjust the verical, he can't adjust the horizontal, and when we're done, we'll return the thread to him. Maybe.

Welcome. ;o]


294 posted on 07/31/2005 5:33:56 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I had the stainless steel stuff somewhere, but it got lost. And I've got an extra pair of wings somewhere...*looking around* Just don't know where they are now...


295 posted on 07/31/2005 5:36:08 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Thanks. Pal.


296 posted on 07/31/2005 5:37:09 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face
Oh dear Helen Thomas is upset that word got out that she would kill herself if Chaney ran for president.

Now that is one woman whos stem cells I do not want to see cloned.

297 posted on 07/31/2005 5:37:20 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: mware

Yah, that was really something. The whole idea of cannibalism is extremely interesting, but I don't think I'd like to see it up close and personal. :o|


298 posted on 07/31/2005 5:38:52 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: KMB

Your a (D) in denial


299 posted on 07/31/2005 5:39:54 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

I can't lose my spoon as I will seriously be lost without it.
I've had it for 25 of my 30 years.
Even wore the on edge of the tip oval.
I will have to look into getting my coffee mug copied 'just in case.'

It's from Pier 1 Imports circa 1970...


300 posted on 07/31/2005 5:40:04 PM PDT by Darksheare ("Just because I have a paper heart, doesn't mean tearing it is okay." -The man with the candy face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 6,261-6,268 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson