There is no evidence she was taunting anyone. That is your latest theory to divert from the clear evidence of battery.
Try again.
“He should not have hit her.” Period. There is no excuse, no justification that makes woman-beating acceptable.
Conservatives understand this.
Progressives defend woman-beating.
Unfortunately, you’re getting an idea of how many men are on the side of woman beaters, whether they’re conservative or not. How much they identify with these people, and why, is a matter for conjecture.
More “men” are defending this obvious assault and coming up with these fantasy explanations and conspiracy theories than any threads for a police vs dog incident.
If that is true then post the audio that goes with the video and let's hear what she was saying the whole time.
That is your latest theory to divert from the clear evidence of battery.
If she was taunting them then she was interfering with police business and probably trying to start a riot -- perhaps the October Surprise. I also notice that she was trying to run away from the officer until he caught her with a punch. It sure stopped her from running and running her mouth off as well.
Conservatives understand this. Progressives defend woman-beating.
Conservatives do not want an October Surprise or rioting in the streets or someone trying to cause it. And if it is a woman trying to cause a riot then she deserves to be dealt with as the law allows.
You seem to be invested in this video. How come you didn't tell us that she was taunting the police??? Why did you lie about what was really going on here???
I'm going to take a break from berating the cop to address this: YES THERE ARE circumstances where taking a swing at a woman is justifiable, such as when she initiates a violent assault. As to whether a particular response is justified, my standard of judgement is: if a man of the same size and strength did the act, what would my justified response be?